K.E. Wiemer

706 citations
22 papers · 565 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

K.E. Wiemer

22 papers receiving 544 citations

Peers

K.E. Wiemer
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Reproductive Medicine 169
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 400
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 90
  • Genetics 136
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 84
Replace Anita Caveney with:
Anita Caveney Canada
S Spanos United Kingdom
Rajadurai Rajamahendran Canada
Saksiri Sirisathien United States
RJ Rodgers Australia
Carol Ann Mele United States
S. YAMADA Japan
Koichi Ushizawa Japan
Kanako Kaneyama Japan
I Rüsse Germany
K.E. Wiemer relative to Anita Caveney Canada Anita Caveney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Anita Caveney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K.E. Wiemer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K.E. Wiemer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K.E. Wiemer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K.E. Wiemer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K.E. Wiemer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K.E. Wiemer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K.E. Wiemer. The network helps show where K.E. Wiemer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K.E. Wiemer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K.E. Wiemer Line = papers co-authored together K.E. Wiemer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992279
2 199381
3 199532
4 199627
5 199224
6 199822
7 198717
8 198715
9 199814
10 199513
11 198911
12 19888
13 20156
14 19885
15 19893
16 19882
17 19981
18 20211
19 19891
20 20231

About K.E. Wiemer

K.E. Wiemer is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, having authored 22 papers that have together received 565 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (15 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (4 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (4 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (3 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (3 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (2 papers) and Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (169 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (400 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (90 citations), Genetics (136 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (84 citations). K.E. Wiemer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Andrew J. Watson, Gilbert A. Schultz, Ann Hahnel, Aileen Hogan, R.A. Godke, David I. Hoffman, W. Maxson, Nury Steuerwald, Jacques Cohen and M. J. Tucker. Their work appears in journals such as Theriogenology, Human Reproduction, Fertility and Sterility, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Equine Veterinary Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact