Ke Cao
- Plant Science top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Lirong WangWeichao FangGengrui ZhuXinwei WangChang‐Wen ChenChang Wen ChenJian GuoJinlong Wu
- Topics
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (45 papers)Plant Reproductive Biology (25 papers)Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Ke Cao
96 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Plant Science 1.2k
- Molecular Biology 855
- Cell Biology 191
- Biochemistry 154
- Genetics 143
Countries citing papers authored by Ke Cao
This map shows the geographic impact of Ke Cao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ke Cao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ke Cao more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ke Cao
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ke Cao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ke Cao. The network helps show where Ke Cao may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ke Cao
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ke Cao. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ke Cao based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ke Cao. Ke Cao is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | The difference of anthocyanin accumulation pattern and related gene expression in two kinds of red flesh peach. | 1 |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | Microscopic observation on adventitious root development of micropropagation and cutting propagation on peach rootstocks. | 3 |
| 16 | Development evaluation of low-carbon economy in Shaanxi Province | 0 |
| 17 | Molecular ID Establishment of Main China Peach Varieties and Peach Related Species | 11 |
| 18 | Genetic linkage maps constructing and markers linked with pistil development and double petal gene in peach. | 1 |
| 19 | Correlative Analysis Between Peach Fruit Types,Quality and Yield | 1 |
| 20 | Inhibitory efficacy of several plant extracts and plant products on Phytophthora infestans | 24 |
About Ke Cao
Ke Cao is a scholar working on Plant Science, Biochemistry and Endocrinology, having authored 105 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (45 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (25 papers) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (1.2k citations), Biochemistry (154 citations) and Horticulture (23 citations). Ke Cao has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Lirong Wang, Weichao Fang, Gengrui Zhu, Xinwei Wang, Chang‐Wen Chen, Chang Wen Chen, Jian Guo, Jinlong Wu, Pei Zhao and Yong Li. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.