Kay Hodges

3.4k total citations
53 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Kay Hodges is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Education and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Kay Hodges has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Clinical Psychology, 10 papers in Education and 8 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Kay Hodges's work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (35 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (10 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers). Kay Hodges is often cited by papers focused on Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (35 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (10 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers). Kay Hodges collaborates with scholars based in United States and Denmark. Kay Hodges's co-authors include Maria M. Wong, Jeffrey J. Kline, Donald H. McKnew, Leon Cytryn, Cheong‐Seok Kim, Lawrence J. Siegel, Larry L. Mullins, Javad H. Kashani, Randall C. Flanery and Qinghong Liao and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and The British Journal of Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Kay Hodges

53 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kay Hodges United States 28 2.0k 483 467 316 307 53 2.5k
Richard Arend United States 18 1.8k 0.9× 436 0.9× 614 1.3× 405 1.3× 319 1.0× 24 2.5k
J. R. Weisz United States 19 2.2k 1.1× 295 0.6× 655 1.4× 215 0.7× 337 1.1× 41 3.0k
Naomi Richman United Kingdom 20 1.4k 0.7× 459 1.0× 520 1.1× 394 1.2× 366 1.2× 43 2.4k
Barry Nurcombe Australia 22 1.5k 0.7× 335 0.7× 314 0.7× 505 1.6× 118 0.4× 83 2.4k
Angelika H. Claussen United States 24 1.8k 0.9× 551 1.1× 358 0.8× 382 1.2× 169 0.6× 59 2.9k
Ellen L. Lipman Canada 30 1.6k 0.8× 335 0.7× 538 1.2× 286 0.9× 138 0.4× 78 2.7k
Jeanie Sheffield Australia 31 2.1k 1.1× 395 0.8× 541 1.2× 233 0.7× 236 0.8× 87 2.9k
Ilja L. Bongers Netherlands 17 1.5k 0.8× 307 0.6× 514 1.1× 185 0.6× 284 0.9× 42 2.1k
Barbara Herjanic United States 10 1.5k 0.8× 625 1.3× 274 0.6× 209 0.7× 320 1.0× 13 2.1k
Terri L. Shelton United States 22 1.8k 0.9× 876 1.8× 756 1.6× 459 1.5× 84 0.3× 50 2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Kay Hodges

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kay Hodges's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kay Hodges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kay Hodges more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kay Hodges

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kay Hodges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kay Hodges. The network helps show where Kay Hodges may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kay Hodges

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kay Hodges. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kay Hodges based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kay Hodges. Kay Hodges is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hodges, Kay, et al.. (2011). Outcomes Management: Incorporating and Sustaining Processes Critical to Using Outcome Data to Guide Practice Improvement. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 39(2). 130–143. 8 indexed citations
2.
Hodges, Kay & Heidi E. Grunwald. (2005). The use of propensity scores to evaluate outcomes for community clinics. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 32(3). 294–305. 7 indexed citations
3.
Hodges, Kay, et al.. (2004). The Role of Monitoring Outcomes in Initiating Implementation of Evidence-Based Treatments at the State Level. Psychiatric Services. 55(4). 396–400. 28 indexed citations
4.
Hodges, Kay, et al.. (2004). Use of the CAFAS to Evaluate Outcome for Youths with Severe Emotional Disturbance Served by Public Mental Health. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 13(3). 325–339. 48 indexed citations
5.
Xue, Yange, et al.. (2004). Predictors of Outcome for Children With Behavior Problems Served in Public Mental Health. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. 33(3). 516–523. 11 indexed citations
7.
Hodges, Kay & Maria M. Wong. (1997). Use of the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale to predict service utilization and cost. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 24(3). 278–290. 84 indexed citations
8.
Hodges, Kay, et al.. (1995). Measures of impairment for children and adolescents. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 22(4). 403–413. 69 indexed citations
9.
Hodges, Kay. (1994). Debate and Argument: Reply to David Shaffer: Structured Interviews for Assessing Children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 35(4). 785–787. 2 indexed citations
11.
Hodges, Kay. (1993). Structured Interviews for Assessing Children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 34(1). 49–68. 122 indexed citations
12.
Hodges, Kay, W. Brian Saunders, Javad H. Kashani, Kim W. Hamlett, & Robert J. Thompson. (1990). Internal Consistency of DSM-III Diagnoses Using the Symptom Scales of the Child Assessment Schedule. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 29(4). 635–641. 15 indexed citations
13.
Hodges, Kay, et al.. (1990). Parent‐Child Agreement on Symptoms Assessed via a Clinical Research Interview for Children: The Child Assessment Schedule (CAS). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 31(3). 427–436. 109 indexed citations
14.
Hodges, Kay, et al.. (1990). Intellectual ability and achievement in psychiatrically hospitalized children with conduct, anxiety, and affective disorders.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 58(5). 589–595. 38 indexed citations
15.
Thompson, Robert J., Kay Hodges, & Kim W. Hamlett. (1990). A Matched Comparison of Adjustment in Children with Cystic Fibrosis and Psychiatrically Referred and Nonreferred Children. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 15(6). 745–759. 40 indexed citations
16.
Hodges, Kay & W. Brian Saunders. (1989). Internal consistency of a diagnostic interview for children: The Child Assessment Schedule. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 17(6). 691–701. 24 indexed citations
17.
Hodges, Kay, Jeffrey J. Kline, Guilio Barbero, & Randall C. Flanery. (1985). Depressive symptoms in children with recurrent abdominal pain and in their families. The Journal of Pediatrics. 107(4). 622–626. 72 indexed citations
18.
Hodges, Kay, et al.. (1982). The Child Assessment Schedule (CAS) Diagnostic Interview: A Report on Reliability and Validity. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry. 21(5). 468–473. 138 indexed citations
19.
Kashani, Javad H., Alt̤āf Ḥusain, Walid O. Shekim, et al.. (1981). Current perspectives on childhood depression: an overview. American Journal of Psychiatry. 138(2). 143–153. 110 indexed citations
20.
Hodges, Kay & David A. Brandt. (1978). Measurement of attribution of causality in counselor behavior.. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 25(4). 343–348. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026