Katrina Forbes‐McKay

1.2k total citations
35 papers, 843 citations indexed

About

Katrina Forbes‐McKay is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Katrina Forbes‐McKay has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 843 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 7 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Katrina Forbes‐McKay's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (8 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (7 papers). Katrina Forbes‐McKay is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (8 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (7 papers). Katrina Forbes‐McKay collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Australia. Katrina Forbes‐McKay's co-authors include Annalena Venneri, Michael F. Shanks, Andrew W. Ellis, Derek Stewart, Vibhu Paudyal, Alison D. Murray, H. G. Gemmell, Roger T. Staff, Katie MacLure and William J. McGeown and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Neuropsychologia and Neuroreport.

In The Last Decade

Katrina Forbes‐McKay

33 papers receiving 807 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Katrina Forbes‐McKay United Kingdom 17 416 393 151 141 129 35 843
Maria Teresa Carthery‐Goulart Brazil 18 433 1.0× 789 2.0× 139 0.9× 180 1.3× 245 1.9× 64 1.3k
Jocelyne de Rotrou France 17 327 0.8× 910 2.3× 40 0.3× 262 1.9× 189 1.5× 43 1.3k
M. Quintana Spain 20 334 0.8× 347 0.9× 102 0.7× 87 0.6× 75 0.6× 36 933
Mary Ferraro United States 12 318 0.8× 292 0.7× 73 0.5× 72 0.5× 67 0.5× 16 862
Ellen Woo United States 16 327 0.8× 588 1.5× 40 0.3× 144 1.0× 66 0.5× 42 1.0k
Ujjwal Ramtekkar United States 13 235 0.6× 409 1.0× 102 0.7× 30 0.2× 116 0.9× 33 991
Kenjiro Komori Japan 18 255 0.6× 725 1.8× 60 0.4× 334 2.4× 101 0.8× 51 1.1k
Alexandra König France 16 271 0.7× 414 1.1× 63 0.4× 138 1.0× 163 1.3× 65 1.1k
Jonathan Jackson United States 17 571 1.4× 460 1.2× 65 0.4× 218 1.5× 115 0.9× 41 1.2k
Gina Carter United Kingdom 9 520 1.3× 722 1.8× 160 1.1× 73 0.5× 132 1.0× 9 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Katrina Forbes‐McKay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katrina Forbes‐McKay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katrina Forbes‐McKay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katrina Forbes‐McKay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katrina Forbes‐McKay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katrina Forbes‐McKay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katrina Forbes‐McKay. The network helps show where Katrina Forbes‐McKay may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katrina Forbes‐McKay

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katrina Forbes‐McKay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katrina Forbes‐McKay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katrina Forbes‐McKay. Katrina Forbes‐McKay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Forbes‐McKay, Katrina, et al.. (2024). The influence of antenatal relaxation classes on perinatal psychological wellbeing and childbirth experiences: a qualitative study. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 44(1). 27–45. 2 indexed citations
3.
Forbes‐McKay, Katrina, et al.. (2023). Exploring independent learning (IL) and its relationship to mindset, motivated strategies for learning and academic performance. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 17(1). 205–218. 1 indexed citations
4.
McCann, Bryan, Paul McCarthy, Kay Cooper, Katrina Forbes‐McKay, & Richard Keegan. (2021). A retrospective investigation of the perceived influence of coaches, parents and peers on talented football players’ motivation during development. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 34(6). 1227–1250. 5 indexed citations
5.
Forbes‐McKay, Katrina, et al.. (2021). Expectant parents’ perspectives on the influence of a single antenatal relaxation class: A qualitative study. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice. 43. 101341–101341. 3 indexed citations
7.
Paudyal, Vibhu, et al.. (2019). Perceived roles and barriers in caring for the people who are homeless: a survey of UK community pharmacists. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. 41(1). 215–227. 20 indexed citations
8.
Forbes‐McKay, Katrina, et al.. (2018). Breastfeeding and the substance‐exposed mother and baby. Birth. 45(4). 450–458. 18 indexed citations
9.
Paudyal, Vibhu, et al.. (2018). Relocating patients from a specialist homeless healthcare centre to general practices: a multi-perspective study. British Journal of General Practice. 68(667). e105–e113. 24 indexed citations
10.
Forbes‐McKay, Katrina, et al.. (2017). Breastfeeding support and opiate dependence: A think aloud study. Midwifery. 50. 239–245. 9 indexed citations
11.
Forbes‐McKay, Katrina, et al.. (2016). Predictors of enhanced mental wellbeing in women 13 months post-miscarriage. European Health Psychologist. 18. 543. 1 indexed citations
12.
Stewart, Derek, et al.. (2016). Influences on prescribing decision-making among non-medical prescribers in the United Kingdom: systematic review. Family Practice. 33(6). 572–579. 23 indexed citations
14.
Forbes‐McKay, Katrina, et al.. (2014). Charting the decline in spontaneous writing in Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal study. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. 26(4). 246–252. 18 indexed citations
15.
Forbes‐McKay, Katrina, Michael F. Shanks, & Annalena Venneri. (2013). Profiling spontaneous speech decline in Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal study. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. 25(6). 320–327. 47 indexed citations
16.
McGeown, William J., Michael F. Shanks, Katrina Forbes‐McKay, et al.. (2010). Established Donepezil Treatment Modulates Regional Brain Activation in Early Alzheimers Disease. Current Alzheimer Research. 7(5). 415–427. 13 indexed citations
17.
McGeown, William J., Michael F. Shanks, Katrina Forbes‐McKay, & Annalena Venneri. (2009). Patterns of brain activity during a semantic task differentiate normal aging from early Alzheimer's disease. Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging. 173(3). 218–227. 19 indexed citations
18.
Forbes‐McKay, Katrina, Andrew W. Ellis, Michael F. Shanks, & Annalena Venneri. (2005). The age of acquisition of words produced in a semantic fluency task can reliably differentiate normal from pathological age related cognitive decline. Neuropsychologia. 43(11). 1625–1632. 85 indexed citations
19.
Forbes‐McKay, Katrina & Annalena Venneri. (2002). A case for case: handling letter case selection in written spelling. Neuropsychologia. 41(1). 16–24. 16 indexed citations
20.
Venneri, Annalena, Michael F. Shanks, Roger T. Staff, et al.. (2002). Cerebral blood flow and cognitive responses to rivastigmine treatment in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroreport. 13(1). 83–87. 88 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026