Katrien Moens

656 total citations
10 papers, 443 citations indexed

About

Katrien Moens is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Katrien Moens has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 443 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 3 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Katrien Moens's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers) and HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2 papers). Katrien Moens is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers) and HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2 papers). Katrien Moens collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Spain. Katrien Moens's co-authors include Richard Harding, Luc Deliëns, Joachim Cohen, Lieve Van den Block, Irene J Higginson, Anneke L. Francke, Sheila Payne, Stein Kaasa, Sarah Brearley and Guido Miccinesi and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management and European Journal of Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Katrien Moens

9 papers receiving 434 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Katrien Moens Belgium 7 305 115 98 83 70 10 443
Roeline Pasman Netherlands 6 408 1.3× 122 1.1× 167 1.7× 105 1.3× 70 1.0× 9 526
Karen Linden Netherlands 4 282 0.9× 102 0.9× 98 1.0× 62 0.7× 70 1.0× 4 376
Satoshi Inoue Japan 13 374 1.2× 147 1.3× 66 0.7× 108 1.3× 43 0.6× 37 636
James Hallenbeck United States 17 491 1.6× 151 1.3× 232 2.4× 159 1.9× 69 1.0× 38 702
Samuel F Allingham Australia 10 338 1.1× 86 0.7× 153 1.6× 104 1.3× 22 0.3× 33 426
Koen Meeussen Netherlands 10 561 1.8× 202 1.8× 205 2.1× 177 2.1× 74 1.1× 13 666
Jennifer S. Scherer United States 11 247 0.8× 64 0.6× 86 0.9× 40 0.5× 18 0.3× 33 466
Kristin Hofsø Norway 16 168 0.6× 76 0.7× 71 0.7× 193 2.3× 86 1.2× 41 600
Deans Buchanan United Kingdom 10 227 0.7× 49 0.4× 90 0.9× 110 1.3× 23 0.3× 27 348
Alina Yee Man Ng Hong Kong 8 220 0.7× 67 0.6× 90 0.9× 50 0.6× 18 0.3× 11 371

Countries citing papers authored by Katrien Moens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katrien Moens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katrien Moens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katrien Moens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katrien Moens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katrien Moens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katrien Moens. The network helps show where Katrien Moens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katrien Moens

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katrien Moens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katrien Moens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katrien Moens. Katrien Moens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Moens, Katrien, Johan Bilsen, & Sofía C. Zambrano. (2024). How do palliative care clinicians use their emotions during end-of-life encounters?. European Journal of Public Health. 34(Supplement_3).
3.
Brichard, Bénédicte, Marleen Renard, Els Vandecruys, et al.. (2018). Building Bridges, Paediatric Palliative Care in Belgium: A secondary data analysis of annual paediatric liaison team reports from 2010 to 2014. BMC Palliative Care. 17(1). 77–77. 10 indexed citations
4.
Hoof, Wannes Van & Katrien Moens. (2018). “Why do they want my data?” – Cancer patients' views on the use of genomic information in health care. European Journal of Public Health. 28(suppl_4). 1 indexed citations
6.
Moens, Katrien, Dirk Houttekier, Lieve Van den Block, et al.. (2015). Place of death of people living with Parkinson’s disease: a population-level study in 11 countries. BMC Palliative Care. 14(1). 28–28. 45 indexed citations
7.
Namisango, Eve, Richard Harding, Elly Katabira, et al.. (2015). A novel symptom cluster analysis among ambulatory HIV/AIDS patients in Uganda. AIDS Care. 27(8). 954–963. 18 indexed citations
8.
Moens, Katrien, Irene J Higginson, Richard Harding, et al.. (2014). Are There Differences in the Prevalence of Palliative Care-Related Problems in People Living With Advanced Cancer and Eight Non-Cancer Conditions? A Systematic Review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 48(4). 660–677. 307 indexed citations
9.
Calanzani, Natália, Katrien Moens, Joachim Cohen, et al.. (2014). Choosing care homes as the least preferred place to die: a cross-national survey of public preferences in seven European countries. BMC Palliative Care. 13(1). 48–48. 22 indexed citations
10.
Daveson, Barbara A, Juan Pedro Alonso, Natália Calanzani, et al.. (2013). Learning from the public: citizens describe the need to improve end-of-life care access, provision and recognition across Europe. European Journal of Public Health. 24(3). 521–527. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026