Kátia Foresti

666 citations
26 papers · 499 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Kátia Foresti

26 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

Kátia Foresti
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 289
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 76
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 124
  • Epidemiology 265
  • Clinical Psychology 107
Replace Emma Black with:
Emma Black Australia
Elizabeth Emmanuel Australia
Wendy Kissin United States
Patricia Droppleman United States
Marga Thome Iceland
Graham Paley United Kingdom
Irene Kane United States
Ri‐hua Xie China
Lauren Bruce Australia
Elisabeth Marks Canada
Kátia Foresti relative to Emma Black Australia Emma Black's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Emma Black · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kátia Foresti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kátia Foresti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kátia Foresti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kátia Foresti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kátia Foresti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kátia Foresti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kátia Foresti. The network helps show where Kátia Foresti may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Kátia Foresti, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kátia Foresti Line = papers co-authored together Kátia Foresti links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201283
2 201170
3 200956
4 201052
5 201036
6 200927
7 201021
8 201220
9 200918
10 201018
11 201316
12 200915
13 201314
14 200911
15 20138
16 20127
17 20107
18 20124
19 20213
20 20153

About Kátia Foresti

Kátia Foresti is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 26 papers that have together received 499 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (12 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (289 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (76 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (124 citations), Epidemiology (265 citations) and Clinical Psychology (107 citations). Kátia Foresti has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Brazil and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Carlos Zúbaran, Marina Schumacher, Mariana Rossi Thorell, Paulo Roberto Franceschini, Cindy‐Lee Dennis, José Mauro Madi, Gregory Saraiva Medeiros, William May, Óscar M. Lozano and Warren May. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, International Journal of STD & AIDS, Women and Birth and Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact