530 total citations 9 papers, 318 citations indexed
About
Kathy Piselli is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Global and Planetary Change and Strategy and Management.
According to data from OpenAlex, Kathy Piselli has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 318 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 2 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 1 paper in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Kathy Piselli's work include International Environmental Law and Policies (1 paper), Forest Management and Policy (1 paper) and American Environmental and Regional History (1 paper). Kathy Piselli is often cited by papers focused on International Environmental Law and Policies (1 paper), Forest Management and Policy (1 paper) and American Environmental and Regional History (1 paper). Kathy Piselli collaborates with scholars based in Germany and United States. Kathy Piselli's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Electronic Green Journal.
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathy Piselli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathy Piselli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathy Piselli more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathy Piselli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathy Piselli. The network helps show where Kathy Piselli may publish in the future.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.