Kathryn Teng

508 total citations
25 papers, 336 citations indexed

About

Kathryn Teng is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Kathryn Teng has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 336 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in General Health Professions, 7 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Kathryn Teng's work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (5 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (4 papers). Kathryn Teng is often cited by papers focused on BRCA gene mutations in cancer (5 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (4 papers). Kathryn Teng collaborates with scholars based in United States, Malaysia and Laos. Kathryn Teng's co-authors include Megan Doerr, Charis Eng, Thomas M. Daly, Michael B. Rothberg, Emily Edelman, Robert E. White, Steven M. Gordon, David F. Stowe, Bret A. Lashner and Timothy J. M. Moss and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, The American Journal of Medicine and The Annals of Family Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Kathryn Teng

23 papers receiving 321 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kathryn Teng United States 10 94 82 76 71 54 25 336
R. Ryanne Wu United States 14 228 2.4× 55 0.7× 51 0.7× 118 1.7× 113 2.1× 33 532
Sue Hill United Kingdom 9 196 2.1× 34 0.4× 60 0.8× 130 1.8× 42 0.8× 21 565
Julie Sakowski United States 13 48 0.5× 33 0.4× 51 0.7× 48 0.7× 83 1.5× 18 446
Jonca Bull United States 7 51 0.5× 34 0.4× 52 0.7× 188 2.6× 61 1.1× 10 493
Susan Andrade United States 9 111 1.2× 95 1.2× 13 0.2× 96 1.4× 36 0.7× 12 519
PC Hannaford United Kingdom 7 40 0.4× 103 1.3× 63 0.8× 102 1.4× 16 0.3× 7 450
Karen Van Nuys United States 10 55 0.6× 41 0.5× 26 0.3× 45 0.6× 56 1.0× 24 590
Sandra L. Kweder United States 12 22 0.2× 121 1.5× 34 0.4× 229 3.2× 40 0.7× 18 587
Laney K. Jones United States 15 153 1.6× 30 0.4× 23 0.3× 124 1.7× 77 1.4× 60 668
Youssef M. Roman United States 13 57 0.6× 19 0.2× 70 0.9× 52 0.7× 15 0.3× 41 434

Countries citing papers authored by Kathryn Teng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn Teng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn Teng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn Teng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathryn Teng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn Teng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn Teng. The network helps show where Kathryn Teng may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathryn Teng

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathryn Teng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathryn Teng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathryn Teng. Kathryn Teng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ang, Yeng, et al.. (2024). Ultrasound treatment of chitosan macrobeads for crack formation and application in column dynamics sorption of methyl orange. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 22(10). 8813–8826.
2.
Teng, Kathryn, et al.. (2022). Virtual Care Adoption—Challenges and Opportunities From the Lens of Academic Primary Care Practitioners. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 28(6). 599–602. 3 indexed citations
3.
Clifton, Jessica, Levi N. Bonnell, Juvena Hitt, et al.. (2021). Differences in Occupational Burnout Among Primary Care Professionals. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 34(6). 1203–1211. 9 indexed citations
4.
Margolius, David, et al.. (2020). Primary Care Physician Factors Associated with Inbox Message Volume. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 33(3). 460–462. 8 indexed citations
5.
Teng, Kathryn. (2018). One Leader’s Journey Toward Empanelment. The Permanente Journal. 22(2). 17–130. 2 indexed citations
6.
Margolius, David, Douglas Gunzler, Michael P. Hopkins, & Kathryn Teng. (2018). Panel Size, Clinician Time in Clinic, and Access to Appointments. The Annals of Family Medicine. 16(6). 546–548. 11 indexed citations
7.
Ryan, Timothy P., Ryan D. Morrison, Jeffrey J. Sutherland, et al.. (2017). Medication adherence, medical record accuracy, and medication exposure in real-world patients using comprehensive medication monitoring. PLoS ONE. 12(9). e0185471–e0185471. 25 indexed citations
8.
Martinez, Kathryn A., et al.. (2017). Are Providers Prepared to Engage Younger Women in Shared Decision-Making for Mammography?. Journal of Women s Health. 27(1). 24–31. 10 indexed citations
9.
Martinez, Kathryn A., et al.. (2017). Factors Associated with Routine Recommendation of Mammography for Women Aged 40–49: Provider Characteristics and Screening Influences. Southern Medical Journal. 110(2). 129–135. 3 indexed citations
10.
Teng, Kathryn, et al.. (2015). Should thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) activity be determined before prescribing azathioprine, mercaptopurine, or thioguanine?. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 82(7). 409–413. 18 indexed citations
11.
Teng, Kathryn. (2015). A Shift Toward Personalized Healthcare: Does the Affordable Care Act Provide Enough Incentive for Change?. Personalized Medicine. 12(3). 231–235. 1 indexed citations
12.
Teng, Kathryn, et al.. (2014). Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Outpatient Primary Care Clinics. The American Journal of Medicine. 128(3). 283–288. 18 indexed citations
13.
Teng, Kathryn, Robert S. Butler, Sarah Schramm, et al.. (2014). Physicians Caring for Physicians: The Perspective of the Primary Care Physician. Southern Medical Journal. 107(5). 301–305. 6 indexed citations
14.
Teng, Kathryn & Louise S. Acheson. (2014). Genomics in Primary Care Practice. Primary Care Clinics in Office Practice. 41(2). 421–435. 8 indexed citations
15.
Teng, Kathryn, et al.. (2013). Should we use pharmacogenetic testing when prescribing warfarin?. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 80(8). 483–486. 2 indexed citations
16.
Teng, Kathryn & David L. Longworth. (2013). Personalized healthcare in the era of value-based healthcare. Personalized Medicine. 10(3). 285–293. 5 indexed citations
17.
Doerr, Megan & Kathryn Teng. (2012). Family history: Still relevant in the genomics era. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 79(5). 331–336. 41 indexed citations
18.
Teng, Kathryn, et al.. (2012). Building an innovative model for personalized healthcare. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 79(4 suppl 1). S1–S9. 11 indexed citations
19.
Teng, Kathryn. (2011). Premenopausal osteoporosis, an overlooked consequence of anorexia nervosa. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 78(1). 50–58. 19 indexed citations
20.
Teng, Kathryn, et al.. (2008). A young woman with fatigue. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 75(3). 215–219. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026