Kathleen Kyle

423 total citations
10 papers, 252 citations indexed

About

Kathleen Kyle is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecological Modeling and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Kathleen Kyle has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 252 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Ecology, 3 papers in Ecological Modeling and 3 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Kathleen Kyle's work include Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (4 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (3 papers). Kathleen Kyle is often cited by papers focused on Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (4 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (3 papers). Kathleen Kyle collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Italy. Kathleen Kyle's co-authors include Julie L. Lockwood, Rafael E. Valentin, George C. Hamilton, Dina M. Fonseca, Michael C. Allen, Anne L. Nielsen, Dustin J. Welbourne, Daniel L. Vera, Richard S. Nowakowski and Zachary Jones and has published in prestigious journals such as Current Biology, Conservation Biology and Molecular Ecology Resources.

In The Last Decade

Kathleen Kyle

8 papers receiving 250 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kathleen Kyle United States 6 160 115 87 27 25 10 252
Nicolas J. Fasel Switzerland 9 101 0.6× 81 0.7× 13 0.1× 8 0.3× 146 5.8× 22 340
D. Selechnik Australia 9 48 0.3× 60 0.5× 12 0.1× 9 0.3× 46 1.8× 11 225
Iain Barr United Kingdom 7 116 0.7× 24 0.2× 23 0.3× 33 1.2× 179 7.2× 12 283
Sylvain Antoniazza Switzerland 10 152 0.9× 32 0.3× 61 0.7× 8 0.3× 216 8.6× 12 345
Mathilde L. Tissier France 10 159 1.0× 14 0.1× 27 0.3× 6 0.2× 147 5.9× 27 303
Junxiao Xu China 5 63 0.4× 94 0.8× 8 0.1× 4 0.1× 61 2.4× 11 201
Lauren E. Des Marteaux Canada 14 211 1.3× 55 0.5× 12 0.1× 11 0.4× 80 3.2× 22 363
Hidetoshi Inamine United States 6 30 0.2× 48 0.4× 78 0.9× 4 0.1× 165 6.6× 8 290
Felix Rakotondraparany Madagascar 8 97 0.6× 47 0.4× 34 0.4× 5 0.2× 94 3.8× 19 249
Lei Shan China 7 74 0.5× 127 1.1× 30 0.3× 1 0.0× 43 1.7× 13 274

Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen Kyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen Kyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen Kyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen Kyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen Kyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen Kyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen Kyle. The network helps show where Kathleen Kyle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathleen Kyle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathleen Kyle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathleen Kyle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathleen Kyle. Kathleen Kyle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
2.
Kyle, Kathleen, Michael C. Allen, Nathan W. Siegert, Jason Grabosky, & Julie L. Lockwood. (2024). Design of an eDNA sampling method for detection of an endophagous forest pest. NeoBiota. 95. 149–164.
3.
Pecori, Francesco, Nicola Luchi, Duccio Migliorini, et al.. (2023). Development of novel LAMP and qPCR assays for rapid and specific identification of Bronze birch borer (Agrilus anxius). Environmental DNA. 5(6). 1177–1190. 3 indexed citations
4.
Kyle, Kathleen, Aurélien Sallé, Francesco Pecori, et al.. (2023). Specificity and Sensitivity of a Rapid LAMP Assay for Early Detection of Emerald Ash Borer (Agrilus planipennis) in Europe. Forests. 14(2). 436–436. 6 indexed citations
5.
Kyle, Kathleen, Michael C. Allen, John F. Bunnell, et al.. (2022). Combining surface and soil environmental DNA with artificial cover objects to improve terrestrial reptile survey detection. Conservation Biology. 36(6). e13939–e13939. 26 indexed citations
6.
Valentin, Rafael E., Kathleen Kyle, Michael C. Allen, Dustin J. Welbourne, & Julie L. Lockwood. (2021). The state, transport, and fate of aboveground terrestrial arthropod eDNA. Environmental DNA. 3(6). 1081–1092. 52 indexed citations
7.
Valentin, Rafael E., Dina M. Fonseca, Kathleen Kyle, et al.. (2020). Moving eDNA surveys onto land: Strategies for active eDNA aggregation to detect invasive forest insects. Molecular Ecology Resources. 20(3). 746–755. 93 indexed citations
8.
Cheng, Yichen, Alyssa J. Rolfe, Christy Hammack, et al.. (2018). An hPSC-Derived Tissue-Resident Macrophage Model Reveals Differential Responses of Macrophages to ZIKV and DENV Infection. Stem Cell Reports. 11(2). 348–362. 27 indexed citations
9.
Beesley, Stephen, Jae Kyoung Kim, Zachary Jones, et al.. (2017). Stability of Wake-Sleep Cycles Requires Robust Degradation of the PERIOD Protein. Current Biology. 27(22). 3454–3467.e8. 40 indexed citations
10.
Allison, Garry T., et al.. (1998). The Reliability of Quadriceps Muscle Stiffness in Individuals with Osgood–Schlatter Disease. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 7(4). 258–266. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026