Kathleen Jones
- Biomedical Engineering
- Molecular Biology
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Co-authors
- Thomas A. FogliaJohn G. PhillipsG. MaerkerMaureen BaforP. O. UadiaMichael J. HaasClare UngersonCatherine M. Jones
- Topics
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers)Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (6 papers)Psychiatric care and mental health services (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Kathleen Jones
37 papers receiving 558 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Biomedical Engineering 191
- Molecular Biology 182
- Clinical Psychology 125
- General Health Professions 95
- Philosophy 75
Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen Jones. The network helps show where Kathleen Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathleen Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathleen Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathleen Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathleen Jones. Kathleen Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | The Making of Social Policy in Britain: From the Poor Law to New Labour | 9 |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | The Year book of social policy in Britain | 64 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | Social welfare in Malaya | 1 |
About Kathleen Jones
Kathleen Jones is a scholar working on General Arts and Humanities, Clinical Psychology and Biochemistry, having authored 43 papers that have together received 698 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (6 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (38 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (42 citations) and Philosophy (75 citations). Kathleen Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Thomas A. Foglia, John G. Phillips, G. Maerker, Maureen Bafor, P. O. Uadia, Michael J. Haas, Clare Ungerson, Catherine M. Jones, Sally Baldwin and L. Lakritz. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, The British Journal of Psychiatry and The Economic Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.