Kathleen Decker
- Oncology top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Cancer Research
- Co-authors
- Pascal LambertHarminder SinghDonna TurnerJacques BrissonAlain DemersAnna M. ChiarelliGregory DoyleJennifer Payne
- Topics
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (44 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (30 papers)Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Kathleen Decker
73 papers receiving 956 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Oncology 677
- Epidemiology 192
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 140
- General Health Professions 114
- Cancer Research 106
Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen Decker
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen Decker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen Decker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen Decker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen Decker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen Decker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen Decker. The network helps show where Kathleen Decker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathleen Decker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathleen Decker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathleen Decker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathleen Decker. Kathleen Decker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | Primary care physician use across the breast cancer care continuum: CanIMPACT study using Canadian administrative data. | 16 |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | Primary care physician use across the breast cancer care continuum | 2 |
| 16 | 189 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | How many general surgeons do you need in rural areas? Three approaches to physician resource planning in southern Manitoba. | 19 |
About Kathleen Decker
Kathleen Decker is a scholar working on Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Epidemiology, having authored 77 papers that have together received 989 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (44 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (30 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (677 citations), Cancer Research (106 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (22 citations). Kathleen Decker has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Pascal Lambert, Harminder Singh, Donna Turner, Jacques Brisson, Alain Demers, Anna M. Chiarelli, Gregory Doyle, Jennifer Payne, Norm Phillips and Bin Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, PLoS ONE and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.