Katherine M. Armstrong
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Tirin MooreMazyar FallahEdward AwhRobert L. BaldwinRobert FairmanKelsey ClarkRonald S. MacWalterKevin Shoemaker
- Topics
- Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomBulgaria
In The Last Decade
Katherine M. Armstrong
13 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.8k
- Molecular Biology 349
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 296
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 130
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 128
Countries citing papers authored by Katherine M. Armstrong
This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine M. Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine M. Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine M. Armstrong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine M. Armstrong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine M. Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine M. Armstrong. The network helps show where Katherine M. Armstrong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katherine M. Armstrong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katherine M. Armstrong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katherine M. Armstrong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katherine M. Armstrong. Katherine M. Armstrong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 | |
| 2 | 46 | |
| 3 | Underpinnings of the Social Edition | 1 |
| 4 | 108 | |
| 5 | 117 | |
| 6 | 252 | |
| 7 | 187 | |
| 8 | 303 | |
| 9 | Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortexbreakdown → | 874 |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 91 | |
| 12 | 96 | |
| 13 | 18 |
About Katherine M. Armstrong
Katherine M. Armstrong is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction and Pharmacology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.8k citations), Sensory Systems (125 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (296 citations). Katherine M. Armstrong has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Tirin Moore, Mazyar Fallah, Edward Awh, Robert L. Baldwin, Robert Fairman, Kelsey Clark, Ronald S. MacWalter, Kevin Shoemaker, John M. Stewart and Eunice J. York. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Neuron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.