Katherine E. Powers

548 total citations
17 papers, 373 citations indexed

About

Katherine E. Powers is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Katherine E. Powers has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 373 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Social Psychology, 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Katherine E. Powers's work include Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). Katherine E. Powers is often cited by papers focused on Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). Katherine E. Powers collaborates with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Katherine E. Powers's co-authors include Todd F. Heatherton, Leah H. Somerville, Alexandra M. Rodman, Dylan D. Wagner, Catherine J. Norris, William M. Kelley, Robert S. Chavez, Jonathan B. Freeman, Thalia Wheatley and Todd F. Heatherton and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Psychological Bulletin and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Katherine E. Powers

16 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Katherine E. Powers United States 11 180 178 104 85 53 17 373
Kuan‐Hua Chen United States 10 132 0.7× 100 0.6× 57 0.5× 66 0.8× 38 0.7× 27 306
Mingyue Xiao China 13 119 0.7× 134 0.8× 122 1.2× 166 2.0× 50 0.9× 46 374
Lotte Veenstra Netherlands 8 164 0.9× 94 0.5× 115 1.1× 100 1.2× 51 1.0× 9 323
Renske van der Cruijsen Netherlands 12 91 0.5× 157 0.9× 133 1.3× 161 1.9× 78 1.5× 25 387
Jane F. Banfield Germany 6 106 0.6× 111 0.6× 103 1.0× 66 0.8× 60 1.1× 8 304
Paula Thomson United States 14 133 0.7× 80 0.4× 127 1.2× 211 2.5× 40 0.8× 41 430
Rotem Leshem Israel 13 74 0.4× 148 0.8× 131 1.3× 154 1.8× 37 0.7× 28 399
Christian E. Salas United Kingdom 13 64 0.4× 142 0.8× 96 0.9× 131 1.5× 26 0.5× 27 454
Géraldine Tapia France 9 68 0.4× 165 0.9× 79 0.8× 194 2.3× 18 0.3× 25 423
Amanda Kesek United States 4 92 0.5× 152 0.9× 135 1.3× 175 2.1× 30 0.6× 4 422

Countries citing papers authored by Katherine E. Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine E. Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine E. Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine E. Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine E. Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine E. Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine E. Powers. The network helps show where Katherine E. Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katherine E. Powers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katherine E. Powers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katherine E. Powers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katherine E. Powers. Katherine E. Powers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Powers, Katherine E., et al.. (2022). Effects of peer observation on risky decision-making in adolescence: A meta-analytic review.. Psychological Bulletin. 148(11-12). 783–812. 13 indexed citations
2.
Rodman, Alexandra M., Katherine E. Powers, Erik K. Kastman, et al.. (2022). Physical Effort Exertion for Peer Feedback Reveals Evolving Social Motivations From Adolescence to Young Adulthood. Psychological Science. 34(1). 60–74. 2 indexed citations
3.
Rodman, Alexandra M., Katherine E. Powers, Catherine Insel, et al.. (2020). How adolescents and adults translate motivational value to action: Age-related shifts in strategic physical effort exertion for monetary rewards.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 150(1). 103–113. 18 indexed citations
4.
Shuman, Clayton J., et al.. (2019). Older Adults' Perceptions of Their Fall Risk and Prevention Strategies After Transitioning from Hospital to Home. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 45(1). 23–30. 20 indexed citations
5.
Powers, Katherine E., Gideon Yaffe, Catherine A. Hartley, et al.. (2018). Consequences for peers differentially bias computations about risk across development.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 147(5). 671–682. 25 indexed citations
6.
Rodman, Alexandra M., Katherine E. Powers, & Leah H. Somerville. (2017). Development of self-protective biases in response to social evaluative feedback. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114(50). 13158–13163. 73 indexed citations
7.
Powers, Katherine E., Leah H. Somerville, William M. Kelley, & Todd F. Heatherton. (2016). Striatal Associative Learning Signals Are Tuned to In-groups. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 28(9). 1243–1254. 2 indexed citations
8.
Powers, Katherine E., Robert S. Chavez, & Todd F. Heatherton. (2015). Individual differences in response of dorsomedial prefrontal cortex predict daily social behavior. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 11(1). 121–126. 29 indexed citations
9.
Powers, Katherine E., et al.. (2014). Social Connection Modulates Perceptions of Animacy. Psychological Science. 25(10). 1943–1948. 43 indexed citations
10.
Powers, Katherine E. & Todd F. Heatherton. (2013). Implicitly Priming the Social Brain: Failure to Find Neural Effects. PLoS ONE. 8(2). e56596–e56596. 7 indexed citations
11.
Chen, Pin‐Hao A., Dylan D. Wagner, William M. Kelley, Katherine E. Powers, & Todd F. Heatherton. (2013). Medial prefrontal cortex differentiates self from mother in Chinese: evidence from self-motivated immigrants. 1(1). 3–15. 21 indexed citations
12.
Powers, Katherine E., Leah H. Somerville, William M. Kelley, & Todd F. Heatherton. (2013). Rejection Sensitivity Polarizes Striatal–Medial Prefrontal Activity When Anticipating Social Feedback. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 25(11). 1887–1895. 31 indexed citations
13.
Powers, Katherine E. & Todd F. Heatherton. (2012). Characterizing socially avoidant and affiliative responses to social exclusion. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience. 6. 46–46. 15 indexed citations
14.
Powers, Katherine E., Dylan D. Wagner, Catherine J. Norris, & Todd F. Heatherton. (2011). Socially excluded individuals fail to recruit medial prefrontal cortex for negative social scenes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 8(2). 151–157. 69 indexed citations
15.
Kench, Jennifer, Katherine E. Powers, Brenda Bradley, et al.. (2004). Role for Oxidative Stress in the Regeneration of Islet Beta Cells?. Journal of Investigative Medicine. 52(01-S1). 45–45. 2 indexed citations
16.
Powers, Katherine E.. (2002). :La Lauda Spirituale Tra Cinque E Seicento. Sixteenth Century Journal. 33(4). 1152–1154. 1 indexed citations
17.
Kravitz, Len, et al.. (1997). EXERCISE MODE AND GENDER COMPARISONS OF ENERGY EXPENDITURE AT SELF-SELECTED INTENSITIES 1159. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 29(Supplement). 203–203. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kuan‐Hua Chen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mingyue Xiao Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lotte Veenstra Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Renske van der Cruijsen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jane F. Banfield Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Paula Thomson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rotem Leshem Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christian E. Salas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Géraldine Tapia Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amanda Kesek
Rankless by CCL
2026