Katharina Nargar

958 total citations
11 papers, 210 citations indexed

About

Katharina Nargar is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecological Modeling. According to data from OpenAlex, Katharina Nargar has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 210 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Molecular Biology, 8 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 2 papers in Ecological Modeling. Recurrent topics in Katharina Nargar's work include Plant and animal studies (7 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (6 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (4 papers). Katharina Nargar is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (7 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (6 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (4 papers). Katharina Nargar collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United Kingdom. Katharina Nargar's co-authors include Lars Nauheimer, Darren M. Crayn, Mark A. Clements, Charles Clarke, Elizabeth Joyce, David E. Albrecht, David Bush, Robert C. Godfree, Nunzio Knerr and Brendan J. Lepschi and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Frontiers in Plant Science and Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.

In The Last Decade

Katharina Nargar

9 papers receiving 207 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Katharina Nargar Australia 7 104 71 60 45 42 11 210
Fabian Brambach Germany 8 62 0.6× 39 0.5× 50 0.8× 32 0.7× 34 0.8× 24 190
Gabriel Damasco Brazil 10 164 1.6× 91 1.3× 34 0.6× 66 1.5× 61 1.5× 14 327
Shujun Wen China 9 77 0.7× 66 0.9× 37 0.6× 41 0.9× 58 1.4× 18 219
André Felippe Nunes‐Freitas Brazil 10 164 1.6× 43 0.6× 17 0.3× 56 1.2× 69 1.6× 37 264
José Luís Marcelo Peña Peru 10 120 1.2× 81 1.1× 23 0.4× 34 0.8× 42 1.0× 21 281
Samantha J. Worthy United States 10 115 1.1× 70 1.0× 32 0.5× 53 1.2× 49 1.2× 27 295
V. A. de Sousa Brazil 10 64 0.6× 38 0.5× 36 0.6× 84 1.9× 40 1.0× 47 269
C. T. White United States 8 62 0.6× 56 0.8× 20 0.3× 72 1.6× 86 2.0× 12 228
Felipe Zamborlini Saiter Brazil 10 203 2.0× 67 0.9× 43 0.7× 27 0.6× 39 0.9× 17 329
Zhofre Aguirre Mendoza Ecuador 10 87 0.8× 77 1.1× 15 0.3× 39 0.9× 56 1.3× 35 272

Countries citing papers authored by Katharina Nargar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katharina Nargar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katharina Nargar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katharina Nargar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katharina Nargar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katharina Nargar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katharina Nargar. The network helps show where Katharina Nargar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katharina Nargar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katharina Nargar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katharina Nargar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katharina Nargar. Katharina Nargar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Calevo, Jacopo, Kingsley W. Dixon, Michael F. Fay, & Katharina Nargar. (2025). A minute to midnight: advances in orchid conservation in the age of extinction. Biodiversity and Conservation. 34(14). 5067–5073.
2.
Clements, Mark A., Stephen J. Bent, James A. Nicholls, et al.. (2024). Plastid phylogenomics reveals evolutionary relationships in the mycoheterotrophic orchid genus Dipodium and provides insights into plastid gene degeneration. Frontiers in Plant Science. 15. 1388537–1388537.
4.
Nargar, Katharina, Stephen J. Bent, Lars Nauheimer, et al.. (2022). Evolutionary Relationships and Range Evolution of Greenhood Orchids (Subtribe Pterostylidinae): Insights From Plastid Phylogenomics. Frontiers in Plant Science. 13. 912089–912089. 6 indexed citations
5.
Wagner, Natascha D., et al.. (2021). Conservation in the face of hybridisation: genome-wide study to evaluate taxonomic delimitation and conservation status of a threatened orchid species. Conservation Genetics. 22(1). 151–168. 8 indexed citations
6.
Godfree, Robert C., Nunzio Knerr, Francisco Encinas‐Viso, et al.. (2021). Implications of the 2019–2020 megafires for the biogeography and conservation of Australian vegetation. Nature Communications. 12(1). 1023–1023. 94 indexed citations
7.
Nauheimer, Lars, et al.. (2021). HybPhaser: A workflow for the detection and phasing of hybrids in target capture data sets. Applications in Plant Sciences. 9(7). 45 indexed citations
9.
Nauheimer, Lars, Rowan Schley, Mark A. Clements, Claire Micheneau, & Katharina Nargar. (2018). Australasian orchid biogeography at continental scale: Molecular phylogenetic insights from the Sun Orchids (Thelymitra, Orchidaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 127. 304–319. 17 indexed citations
10.
Nargar, Katharina, et al.. (2018). Australasian orchid diversification in time and space: molecular phylogenetic insights from the beard orchids (Calochilus, Diurideae). Australian Systematic Botany. 31(6). 389–408. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026