Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Automatic Age Estimation Based on Facial Aging Patterns
2007666 citationsXin Geng, Kate Smith‐Miles et al.profile →
Characteristic-Based Clustering for Time Series Data
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Smith‐Miles
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Smith‐Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Smith‐Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Smith‐Miles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Smith‐Miles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Smith‐Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Smith‐Miles. The network helps show where Kate Smith‐Miles may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Smith‐Miles
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Smith‐Miles.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Smith‐Miles based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Smith‐Miles. Kate Smith‐Miles is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kandanaarachchi, Sevvandi, Mario Andrés Muñoz, & Kate Smith‐Miles. (2019). Instance Space Analysis for Unsupervised Outlier Detection. Monash University Research Portal (Monash University).3 indexed citations
Foumani, Mehdi, et al.. (2015). Stochastic scheduling of an automated two-machine robotic cell with in-process inspection system. FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia). 528–535.1 indexed citations
14.
Smith‐Miles, Kate, et al.. (2011). Generalising algorithm performance in instance space: A timetabling case study. Lecture notes in computer science.1 indexed citations
15.
Geng, Xin, Liang Wang, Ming Li, Qiang Wu, & Kate Smith‐Miles. (2007). Distance-driven Fusion of Gait and Face for Human Identification in Video. UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney). 19–24.5 indexed citations
16.
Phua, Clifton, Kate Smith‐Miles, Vincent Lee, & Ross W. Gayler. (2007). Adaptive spike detection for resilient data stream mining. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 70. 181–188.11 indexed citations
Smith‐Miles, Kate, et al.. (2003). A self-organising neural network with intermittent switching dynamics for combinatorial optimisation. 104. 13–21.1 indexed citations
19.
Schwartz, Daniel, Kate Smith‐Miles, Leonid Churilov, Michael Dally, & Richard W. Weber. (2003). Improving risk grouping rules for prostate cancer patients using self-organising maps. 104. 126–135.6 indexed citations
20.
Ali, Shawkat & Kate Smith‐Miles. (2003). Matching SVM kernel's suitability to data characteristics using tree by fuzzy C-means clustering. 104. 553–562.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.