Kate Skog

903 total citations
9 papers, 425 citations indexed

About

Kate Skog is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Skog has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 425 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Atmospheric Science, 6 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 3 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Kate Skog's work include Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (9 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (6 papers) and Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (5 papers). Kate Skog is often cited by papers focused on Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (9 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (6 papers) and Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (5 papers). Kate Skog collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. Kate Skog's co-authors include Frank N. Keutsch, Allen H. Goldstein, Karsten Baumann, P. Romer, R. C. Cohen, Tran B. Nguyen, Stefano Decesari, Jeffrey L. Collett, Amy P. Sullivan and Natasha Hodas and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Analytical Chemistry and Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Kate Skog

9 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers

Kate Skog

AS

HTM

GPC

EE

AE

Dhruv Mitroo United States

C. Plass‐Duelmer Germany

Zachary Finewax United States

Avi Lavi Israel

M. Erickson United States

Luis Barreira Finland

Vincent Michoud France

Benoît Grosselin France

Beth S. Nelson United Kingdom

Gan Yang China

Dhruv Mitroo United States

Kate Skog

468 ×1.3

AS

294 ×1.2

HTM

166 ×1.3

GPC

67 ×0.7

EE

41 ×1.2

AE

Citations per year, relative to Kate Skog Kate Skog (= 1×) peers Dhruv Mitroo

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Skog

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Skog's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Skog with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Skog more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Skog

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Skog. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Skog. The network helps show where Kate Skog may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Skog

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Skog. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Skog based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Skog. Kate Skog is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Xiong, Fulizi, Misti Levy Zamora, Kate Skog, et al.. (2021). Stationary and portable multipollutant monitors for high-spatiotemporal-resolution air quality studies including online calibration. Atmospheric measurement techniques. 14(2). 995–1013. 27 indexed citations

2.

Skog, Kate, et al.. (2019). Compact, Automated, Inexpensive, and Field-Deployable Vacuum-Outlet Gas Chromatograph for Trace-Concentration Gas-Phase Organic Compounds. Analytical Chemistry. 91(2). 1318–1327. 20 indexed citations

3.

Zare, Azimeh, P. Romer, Tran B. Nguyen, et al.. (2018). A comprehensive organic nitrate chemistry: insights into the lifetime of atmospheric organic nitrates. Atmospheric chemistry and physics. 18(20). 15419–15436. 64 indexed citations

4.

Hettiyadura, Anusha P. S., Lu Xu, Thilina Jayarathne, et al.. (2018). Source apportionment of organic carbon in Centreville, AL using organosulfates in organic tracer-based positive matrix factorization. Atmospheric Environment. 186. 74–88. 25 indexed citations

5.

Hettiyadura, Anusha P. S., Thilina Jayarathne, Karsten Baumann, et al.. (2017). Qualitative and quantitative analysis of atmospheric organosulfates in Centreville, Alabama. Atmospheric chemistry and physics. 17(2). 1343–1359. 85 indexed citations

6.

Su, L., Edward G. Patton, Jordi Vilà-Guerau De Arellano, et al.. (2016). Understanding isoprene photooxidation using observations and modeling over a subtropical forest in the southeastern US. Atmospheric chemistry and physics. 16(12). 7725–7741. 20 indexed citations

7.

Sullivan, Amy P., Natasha Hodas, Barbara J. Turpin, et al.. (2016). Evidence for ambient dark aqueous SOA formation in the Po Valley, Italy. Atmospheric chemistry and physics. 16(13). 8095–8108. 36 indexed citations

8.

Feiner, P. A., W. H. Brune, D.O. Miller, et al.. (2016). Testing Atmospheric Oxidation in an Alabama Forest. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 73(12). 4699–4710. 48 indexed citations

9.

Hodas, Natasha, Amy P. Sullivan, Kate Skog, et al.. (2014). Aerosol Liquid Water Driven by Anthropogenic Nitrate: Implications for Lifetimes of Water-Soluble Organic Gases and Potential for Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation. Environmental Science & Technology. 48(19). 11127–11136. 100 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact