Kate O’Connor

881 total citations
9 papers, 656 citations indexed

About

Kate O’Connor is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate O’Connor has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 656 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Kate O’Connor's work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (6 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers). Kate O’Connor is often cited by papers focused on Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (6 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers). Kate O’Connor collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Ireland and Canada. Kate O’Connor's co-authors include Ian J. Kirk, Jeff P. Hamm, Andréia Santos, D. Da Fonséca, Christine Deruelle, Delphine Rosset, Émmanuel Stip, Ricardo Segurado, Amanda Fitzgerald and Barbara Dooley and has published in prestigious journals such as Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders and Journal of Adolescence.

In The Last Decade

Kate O’Connor

9 papers receiving 629 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Kate O’Connor New Zealand	7	603	219	148	93	87	9	656
Annie Cardinaux United States	7	507 0.8×	218 1.0×	134 0.9×	87 0.9×	92 1.1×	15	609
Beatriz López United Kingdom	14	744 1.2×	429 2.0×	197 1.3×	148 1.6×	79 0.9×	36	901
Kiyoshi Yaguchi Japan	5	553 0.9×	203 0.9×	62 0.4×	51 0.5×	74 0.9×	12	589
Janine Spencer United Kingdom	11	534 0.9×	227 1.0×	61 0.4×	87 0.9×	81 0.9×	16	647
Tanya St. John United States	12	474 0.8×	136 0.6×	202 1.4×	153 1.6×	107 1.2×	28	608
Christine M. Falter United Kingdom	12	702 1.2×	217 1.0×	132 0.9×	240 2.6×	118 1.4×	20	872
Arnaud Coëz France	7	424 0.7×	142 0.6×	73 0.5×	45 0.5×	68 0.8×	14	475
Anita Marsden United Kingdom	6	779 1.3×	388 1.8×	216 1.5×	177 1.9×	120 1.4×	6	854
Shelly Steele United States	5	609 1.0×	204 0.9×	145 1.0×	132 1.4×	146 1.7×	6	681
Cara M. Keifer United States	12	541 0.9×	113 0.5×	113 0.8×	121 1.3×	77 0.9×	17	662

Countries citing papers authored by Kate O’Connor

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate O’Connor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate O’Connor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate O’Connor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate O’Connor

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate O’Connor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate O’Connor. The network helps show where Kate O’Connor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate O’Connor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate O’Connor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate O’Connor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate O’Connor. Kate O’Connor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Slevin, Marie, et al.. (2020). Therapeutic Listening for Preterm Children with Sensory Dysregulation, Attention and Cognitive Problems.. PubMed. 113(1). 4–4. 3 indexed citations

O’Connor, Kate, et al.. (2016). Modeling problem behaviors in a nationally representative sample of adolescents. Journal of Adolescence. 50(1). 6–15. 5 indexed citations

O’Connor, Kate. (2011). Auditory processing in autism spectrum disorder: A review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 36(2). 836–854. 343 indexed citations

Rosset, Delphine, et al.. (2009). Do children perceive features of real and cartoon faces in the same way? Evidence from typical development and autism. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 32(2). 212–218. 28 indexed citations

O’Connor, Kate & Ian J. Kirk. (2008). Brief Report: Atypical Social Cognition and Social Behaviours in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Different Way of Processing Rather than an Impairment. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 38(10). 1989–1997. 40 indexed citations

O’Connor, Kate, Jeff P. Hamm, & Ian J. Kirk. (2007). Neurophysiological responses to face, facial regions and objects in adults with Asperger's syndrome: An ERP investigation. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 63(3). 283–293. 68 indexed citations

O’Connor, Kate. (2007). Brief Report: Impaired Identification of Discrepancies Between Expressive Faces and Voices in Adults with Asperger’s Syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 37(10). 2008–2013. 42 indexed citations

O’Connor, Kate, Jeff P. Hamm, & Ian J. Kirk. (2005). The neurophysiological correlates of face processing in adults and children with Asperger’s syndrome. Brain and Cognition. 59(1). 82–95. 119 indexed citations

O’Connor, Kate, et al.. (2000). Automatic and controlled processing in chronic tic disorders.. PubMed. 43(1-3). 349–52. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact