Kate Ingenloff

1.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 718 citations indexed

About

Kate Ingenloff is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Ecology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Ingenloff has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 718 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Ecological Modeling, 8 papers in Ecology and 4 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Kate Ingenloff's work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (15 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (7 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers). Kate Ingenloff is often cited by papers focused on Species Distribution and Climate Change (15 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (7 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers). Kate Ingenloff collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Mexico. Kate Ingenloff's co-authors include A. Townsend Peterson, Hannah L. Owens, Lindsay P. Campbell, Jorge Soberón, Narayani Barve, Andrés Lira‐Noriega, Christopher Michael Hensz, L. Lynnette Dornak, Erin E. Saupe and Corinne Myers and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Trends in Ecology & Evolution and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Kate Ingenloff

16 papers receiving 706 citations

Hit Papers

Constraints on interpretation of ecological niche models ... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kate Ingenloff United States 9 441 281 220 141 140 17 718
L. Lynnette Dornak United States 8 363 0.8× 244 0.9× 177 0.8× 123 0.9× 137 1.0× 11 683
Christopher Michael Hensz United States 5 540 1.2× 337 1.2× 273 1.2× 162 1.1× 80 0.6× 6 743
Carlos Yáñez‐Arenas Mexico 15 361 0.8× 336 1.2× 249 1.1× 168 1.2× 104 0.7× 47 796
Connor M. French United States 4 555 1.3× 359 1.3× 217 1.0× 218 1.5× 53 0.4× 8 803
Kenneth F. Kellner United States 17 294 0.7× 753 2.7× 344 1.6× 121 0.9× 49 0.3× 73 1.0k
Anna C. Peterson United States 14 153 0.3× 187 0.7× 150 0.7× 71 0.5× 88 0.6× 38 547
Jayasilan Mohd‐Azlan Malaysia 15 220 0.5× 704 2.5× 141 0.6× 141 1.0× 46 0.3× 77 891
Megan Bontrager Canada 10 315 0.7× 216 0.8× 345 1.6× 360 2.6× 43 0.3× 14 774
Anna J. Phillips United States 15 160 0.4× 413 1.5× 56 0.3× 171 1.2× 72 0.5× 42 795
Christine Steiner São Bernardo Brazil 15 152 0.3× 393 1.4× 196 0.9× 104 0.7× 164 1.2× 34 709

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Ingenloff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Ingenloff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Ingenloff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Ingenloff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Ingenloff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Ingenloff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Ingenloff. The network helps show where Kate Ingenloff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Ingenloff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Ingenloff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Ingenloff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Ingenloff. Kate Ingenloff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Ingenloff, Kate, et al.. (2024). Prototype Biodiversity Digital Twin: Disease Outbreaks. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 10. 3 indexed citations
2.
Maureaud, Aurore, Robert Guralnick, Mélodie A. McGeoch, et al.. (2023). A globally integrated structure of taxonomy to support biodiversity science and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 38(12). 1143–1153. 25 indexed citations
3.
Maureaud, Aurore, Robert Guralnick, Mélodie A. McGeoch, et al.. (2022). Getting the GIST: Testing an integrative data structure for linking taxonomy, biodiversity and conservation. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards. 6. 1 indexed citations
4.
Sica, Yanina V., et al.. (2022). Application of Humboldt Extension to Real-world Cases. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards. 6. 1 indexed citations
5.
Freeman, Benedictus, Daniel Jiménez‐García, Marlon E. Cobos, et al.. (2022). On the potential of documenting decadal-scale avifaunal change from before-and-after comparisons of museum and observational data across North America. Avian Research. 13. 100005–100005. 2 indexed citations
6.
Ingenloff, Kate & A. Townsend Peterson. (2020). Incorporating time into the traditional correlational distributional modelling framework: A proof‐of‐concept using the Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 12(2). 311–321. 20 indexed citations
7.
Jiménez, Laura, et al.. (2020). Inventory statistics meet big data: complications for estimating numbers of species. PeerJ. 8. e8872–e8872. 2 indexed citations
8.
Ingenloff, Kate, Erin E. Saupe, & A. Townsend Peterson. (2019). The Biodiversity Informatics Training Curriculum (BITC): Versions 1 and 2. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards. 3. 1 indexed citations
9.
Ingenloff, Kate. (2017). Biologically informed ecological niche models for an example pelagic, highly mobile species. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 55–75. 5 indexed citations
10.
Ingenloff, Kate, Christopher Michael Hensz, Vijay Barve, et al.. (2017). Predictable invasion dynamics in North American populations of the Eurasian collared dove Streptopelia decaocto. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 284(1862). 20171157–20171157. 16 indexed citations
11.
Peterson, A. Townsend & Kate Ingenloff. (2016). Biodiversity Informatics Training Curriculum, version 1.2. Latin American Theatre Review (The University of Kansas). 11. 8 indexed citations
12.
Ingenloff, Kate & A. Townsend Peterson. (2015). Trans-Amazon dispersal potential for Crotalus durissus during Pleistocene climate events. Biota Neopropica. 15(2). 8 indexed citations
13.
Campbell, Lindsay P., Jorge Soberón, CE Myers, et al.. (2014). A test of niche centrality as a determinant of population trends and conservation status in threatened and endangered North American birds. Endangered Species Research. 26(3). 201–208. 33 indexed citations
14.
Owens, Hannah L., Lindsay P. Campbell, L. Lynnette Dornak, et al.. (2013). Constraints on interpretation of ecological niche models by limited environmental ranges on calibration areas. Ecological Modelling. 263. 10–18. 516 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Ingenloff, Kate, et al.. (2012). Feed‐through insecticides for the control of the sand fly Phlebotomus argentipes. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 27(1). 10–18. 37 indexed citations
16.
Owens, Hannah L., Lindsay P. Campbell, L. Lynnette Dornak, et al.. (2012). Constraints on Interpretation of Ecological Niche Models by Limited Environmental Ranges on Calibration Areas: Software Script Appendix. KU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas). 1 indexed citations
17.
Poché, David M., et al.. (2011). Bionomics of phlebotomine sand flies from three villages in Bihar, India. Journal of Vector Ecology. 36. S106–S117. 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026