Kate D’Este

3.7k citations
9 papers · 201 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Kate D’Este

9 papers receiving 190 citations

Peers

Kate D’Este
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Health 28
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 71
  • General Health Professions 50
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 44
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 6
Replace Andrew Tonkin with:
Andrew Tonkin Australia
Yoojin Lee United States
Gabriel Porto Soares Brazil
Hoang-Long Vo Vietnam
Walter Lloyd-Smith United Kingdom
Vartika Saxena India
Wai-Cho Yu Hong Kong
Troy P. Coon United States
Johann Frick Germany
C. Patterson Canada
Kate D’Este relative to Andrew Tonkin Australia Andrew Tonkin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Andrew Tonkin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate D’Este

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate D’Este's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate D’Este with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate D’Este more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate D’Este

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate D’Este. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate D’Este. The network helps show where Kate D’Este may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate D’Este, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate D’Este Line = papers co-authored together Kate D’Este links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 199756
2 199844
3
Monitoring the incidence of cardiovascular disease in Australia
200133
4 199919
5 200416
6 200011
7
A universal precautions education intervention for health workers in Sardjito and PKU Hospital Indonesia.
20009
8 19998
9 19995

About Kate D’Este

Kate D’Este is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, General Health Professions and Rehabilitation, having authored 9 papers that have together received 201 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (4 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (2 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (2 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (2 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors (1 paper), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (1 paper), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (1 paper) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (28 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (71 citations), General Health Professions (50 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (44 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (6 citations). Kate D’Este has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, China and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Annette J. Dobson, Patrick McElduff, Richard F Heller, Michael J Sladden, Tracey Bruce, Jeanette Ward, M. Hobbs, Alistair W. Stewart, Robert Beaglehole and K. D. Jamrozik. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal on Ageing, The Medical Journal of Australia, American Journal of Epidemiology, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact