Kate Crewdson

2.1k citations
27 papers · 851 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Kate Crewdson

27 papers receiving 814 citations

Peers

Kate Crewdson
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 420
  • Emergency Medicine 647
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 64
  • Surgery 343
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 208
Replace Charles D. Deakin with:
Charles D. Deakin United Kingdom
Mark J. Sagarin United States
Maureen McCollough United States
Jon-Kenneth Heltne Norway
Leif Rognås Denmark
Karel Habig Australia
John Stouffer United States
Amélia G. Reis Brazil
Sulagna Bhattacharjee India
Rasmus Hesselfeldt Denmark
Kate Crewdson relative to Charles D. Deakin United Kingdom Charles D. Deakin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Charles D. Deakin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Crewdson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Crewdson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Crewdson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Crewdson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Crewdson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Crewdson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Crewdson. The network helps show where Kate Crewdson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Crewdson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Crewdson Line = papers co-authored together Kate Crewdson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006181
2 2014103
3 201793
4 201791
5 201477
6 200745
7 201933
8 201433
9 201829
10 200923
11 201823
12 201817
13 201116
14 201916
15 201812
16 202011
17 20218
18 20217
19 20157
20 20077

About Kate Crewdson

Kate Crewdson is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 851 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (18 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (14 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (11 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (7 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (5 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (4 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (420 citations), Emergency Medicine (647 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (64 citations), Surgery (343 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (208 citations). Kate Crewdson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include David Lockey, Gareth E. Davies, Anne Weaver, Hans Morten Lossius, Marius Rehn, DJ Lockey, Jo Røislien, Jerry P. Nolan, Cassandra Wright and Wolfgang Voelckel. Their work appears in journals such as Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Anaesthesia, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica and Injury.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact