Kari Roesch Goodman
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Ecology
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Genetics
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Co-authors
- David H. HembryJeremy B. YoderPatrick O’GradyGeorge RoderickStephen C. WelterErica N. SpotswoodJay D. CarlisleJosée S. Rousseau
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (7 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers)Orthoptera Research and Taxonomy (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Ecological ModelingEcology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsNature and Landscape Conservation
- Partner nations
- United StatesCzechiaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Kari Roesch Goodman
13 papers receiving 277 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 164
- Ecology 110
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 83
- Genetics 76
- Ecological Modeling 55
Countries citing papers authored by Kari Roesch Goodman
This map shows the geographic impact of Kari Roesch Goodman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kari Roesch Goodman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kari Roesch Goodman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kari Roesch Goodman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kari Roesch Goodman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kari Roesch Goodman. The network helps show where Kari Roesch Goodman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kari Roesch Goodman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kari Roesch Goodman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kari Roesch Goodman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kari Roesch Goodman. Kari Roesch Goodman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 49 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 76 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 62 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 3 |
About Kari Roesch Goodman
Kari Roesch Goodman is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecological Modeling and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 13 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers) and Orthoptera Research and Taxonomy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (55 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (164 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (83 citations). Kari Roesch Goodman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include David H. Hembry, Jeremy B. Yoder, Patrick O’Grady, George Roderick, Stephen C. Welter, Erica N. Spotswood, Jay D. Carlisle, Josée S. Rousseau, Diana L. Humple and Rosemary G. Gillespie. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, The American Naturalist and Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.