Kari Høeg
- Reproductive Medicine top 2%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Surgery
- Oncology
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Co-authors
- Per KolstadJ. Chr. AureBjarne HagerJohn H. CrosbyEinar PedersenMargaret DavyA EngesetEduard E. de Lange
- Topics
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (7 papers)Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (6 papers)Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- NorwayUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kari Høeg
27 papers receiving 473 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Reproductive Medicine 334
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 148
- Surgery 124
- Oncology 105
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 101
Countries citing papers authored by Kari Høeg
This map shows the geographic impact of Kari Høeg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kari Høeg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kari Høeg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kari Høeg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kari Høeg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kari Høeg. The network helps show where Kari Høeg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kari Høeg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kari Høeg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kari Høeg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kari Høeg. Kari Høeg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | Smear biopsies: a cause of negative follow-up biopsies in patients with premalignant conditions of the uterine cervix. | 1 |
| 3 | 28 | |
| 4 | Tumor cells in blood: the prognostic significance of tumor cells in blood during palpation and biopsy. | 5 |
| 5 | The value of urine cytology in the diagnosis of recurrent bladder tumors. A preliminary report. | 6 |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 44 | |
| 10 | Clinical and histologic studies of ovarian carcinoma. Long-term follow-up of 990 cases. | 218 |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | [Ovarian neoplasms. A retrospective study of 990 cases]. | 6 |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | Mass screening for cancer and precancerous conditions of cervix uteri. A preliminary report. | 4 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Kari Høeg
Kari Høeg is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 548 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (7 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (6 papers) and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (334 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (148 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (101 citations). Kari Høeg has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Per Kolstad, J. Chr. Aure, Bjarne Hager, John H. Crosby, Einar Pedersen, Margaret Davy, A Engeset, Eduard E. de Lange, E.H. Cooper and Herman Høst. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Cancer and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.