Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Amazon Mechanical Turk: Gold Mine or Coal Mine?
2011473 citationsKarën Fort, Gilles Adda et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Karën Fort's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karën Fort with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karën Fort more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karën Fort. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karën Fort. The network helps show where Karën Fort may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karën Fort
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karën Fort.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karën Fort based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Karën Fort. Karën Fort is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fort, Karën, et al.. (2012). Analyzing the Impact of Prevalence on the Evaluation of a Manual Annotation Campaign. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).
15.
Grouin, Cyril, Sophie Rosset, Pierre Zweigenbaum, et al.. (2011). Proposal for an Extension of Traditional Named Entitites: from Guidelines to Evaluation, an Overview. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).9 indexed citations
16.
Sagot, Benoît, Karën Fort, Gilles Adda, Joseph Mariani, & Bernard Lang. (2011). Un turc mécanique pour les ressources linguistiques : critique de la myriadisation du travail parcellisé. California medicine. 108(5). 345–9.4 indexed citations
17.
Grouin, Cyril, Sophie Rosset, Pierre Zweigenbaum, et al.. (2011). Proposal for an Extension of Traditional Named Entities: From Guidelines to Evaluation, an Overview. 92–100.20 indexed citations
18.
Sagot, Benoît, et al.. (2009). Extension and coupling of syntactic and semantic resources for French adverbs. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 32(2). 305–315.1 indexed citations
Fort, Karën & Bruno Guillaume. (2007). PrepLex : un lexique des prépositions du français pour l'analyse syntaxique. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 205–214.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.