Karen Dagerman

5.3k total citations · 3 hit papers
17 papers, 3.4k citations indexed

About

Karen Dagerman is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Karen Dagerman has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 3.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 4 papers in Physiology and 3 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Karen Dagerman's work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (10 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (9 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers). Karen Dagerman is often cited by papers focused on Schizophrenia research and treatment (10 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (9 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers). Karen Dagerman collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Czechia. Karen Dagerman's co-authors include Philip S. Insel, Lon S. Schneider, Lon S. Schneider, Pierre N. Tariot, Barry D. Lebowitz, John Hsiao, David L. Sultzer, Sonia M. Davis, T. Scott Stroup and Jeffrey A. Lieberman and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and American Journal of Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Karen Dagerman

16 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Hit Papers

Risk of Death With Atypical Antipsychotic Drug Treatment ... 2005 2026 2012 2019 2005 2006 2006 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Karen Dagerman United States 11 2.4k 581 498 492 484 17 3.4k
Heidi Taipale Finland 38 3.7k 1.5× 837 1.4× 864 1.7× 265 0.5× 407 0.8× 257 5.8k
Kaycee M. Sink United States 31 1.8k 0.8× 888 1.5× 444 0.9× 524 1.1× 1.5k 3.1× 93 5.2k
Joan Vilalta‐Franch Spain 33 1.7k 0.7× 292 0.5× 458 0.9× 705 1.4× 514 1.1× 107 3.0k
Sylvaine Artéro France 30 2.1k 0.9× 511 0.9× 574 1.2× 344 0.7× 839 1.7× 79 4.1k
Beverly N. Jones United States 18 2.4k 1.0× 321 0.6× 281 0.6× 523 1.1× 993 2.1× 23 5.0k
Hanna Kaduszkiewicz Germany 33 1.6k 0.6× 629 1.1× 283 0.6× 982 2.0× 529 1.1× 124 3.8k
Jacqueline Stack United States 28 1.5k 0.6× 349 0.6× 718 1.4× 373 0.8× 421 0.9× 57 4.6k
Jacobo Mintzer United States 40 3.7k 1.5× 529 0.9× 757 1.5× 473 1.0× 1.3k 2.7× 137 6.0k
Jason T. Olin United States 34 2.5k 1.0× 322 0.6× 501 1.0× 431 0.9× 1.3k 2.7× 79 5.1k
Helen C. Kales United States 45 3.6k 1.5× 804 1.4× 1.4k 2.7× 1.7k 3.4× 482 1.0× 170 6.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Karen Dagerman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karen Dagerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen Dagerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen Dagerman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karen Dagerman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen Dagerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen Dagerman. The network helps show where Karen Dagerman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen Dagerman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen Dagerman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen Dagerman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen Dagerman. Karen Dagerman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Sultzer, David L., John Hsiao, Sonia M. Davis, et al.. (2021). Effectiveness of Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease. UNC Libraries. 1 indexed citations
2.
Dagerman, Karen, Pierre N. Tariot, David L. Sultzer, et al.. (2020). Metabolic Changes Associated With Second-Generation Antipsychotic Use in Alzheimer’s Disease Patients: The CATIE-AD Study. UNC Libraries.
3.
Vigen, Cheryl, Wendy J. Mack, Richard S.E. Keefe, et al.. (2011). Cognitive Effects of Atypical Antipsychotic Medications in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: Outcomes From CATIE-AD. American Journal of Psychiatry. 168(8). 831–839. 178 indexed citations
4.
Schneider, Lon S., Cheryl Vigen, Wendy J. Mack, et al.. (2009). O4‐04‐01: Citalopram compared to atypical antipsychotics for Alzheimer patients who did not previously benefit from treatment: The catie‐AD study. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 5(4S_Part_5). 8 indexed citations
5.
Zheng, Ling, Wendy J. Mack, Karen Dagerman, et al.. (2009). Metabolic Changes Associated With Second-Generation Antipsychotic Use in Alzheimer’s Disease Patients: The CATIE-AD Study. American Journal of Psychiatry. 166(5). 583–590. 65 indexed citations
6.
Sultzer, David L., Sonia M. Davis, Pierre N. Tariot, et al.. (2008). Clinical Symptom Responses to Atypical Antipsychotic Medications in Alzheimer’s Disease: Phase 1 Outcomes From the CATIE-AD Effectiveness Trial. American Journal of Psychiatry. 165(7). 844–854. 207 indexed citations
7.
Schneider, Lon S., et al.. (2008). O3‐04–08: No secular trend and high variability for ADAS‐cog change among placebo groups from clinical trials. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 4(4S_Part_5). 4 indexed citations
8.
9.
Schneider, Lon S., Karen Dagerman, & Philip S. Insel. (2006). Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Atypical Antipsychotics for Dementia: Meta-analysis of Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 14(3). 191–210. 623 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Dagerman, Karen, Maryellen C. MacDonald, & Michael W. Harm. (2006). Aging and the Use of Context in Ambiguity Resolution: Complex Changes From Simple Slowing. Cognitive Science. 30(2). 311–345. 43 indexed citations
11.
Schneider, Lon S., Pierre N. Tariot, Karen Dagerman, et al.. (2006). Effectiveness of Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 355(15). 1525–1538. 760 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Schneider, Lon S., Karen Dagerman, & Philip S. Insel. (2006). Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs, Dementia, and Risk of Death—Reply. JAMA. 295(5). 495–495. 1 indexed citations
13.
Schneider, Lon S., Karen Dagerman, & Philip S. Insel. (2005). Risk of Death With Atypical Antipsychotic Drug Treatment for Dementia. JAMA. 294(15). 1934–1934. 1178 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Schneider, Lon S. & Karen Dagerman. (2003). Psychosis of Alzheimer's disease: clinical characteristics and history. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 38(1). 105–111. 45 indexed citations
15.
Schneider, Lon S., M. Saleem Ismail, Karen Dagerman, et al.. (2003). Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE): Alzheimer's Disease Trial. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 29(1). 57–72. 45 indexed citations
16.
Olin, Jason T., et al.. (2002). Increasing Ethnic Minority Participation in Alzheimer Disease Research. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders. 16. S82–S85. 43 indexed citations
17.
Schneider, Lon S., Pierre N. Tariot, Constantine G. Lyketsos, et al.. (2001). National Institute of Mental Health Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE): Alzheimer Disease Trial Methodology. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 9(4). 346–360. 171 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026