Karan J. Odom

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
32 papers, 916 citations indexed

About

Karan J. Odom is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Developmental Biology and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Karan J. Odom has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 916 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 25 papers in Developmental Biology and 14 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Karan J. Odom's work include Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (25 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (20 papers) and Plant and animal studies (15 papers). Karan J. Odom is often cited by papers focused on Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (25 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (20 papers) and Plant and animal studies (15 papers). Karan J. Odom collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Costa Rica. Karan J. Odom's co-authors include Kevin E. Omland, Michelle L. Hall, Naomi E. Langmore, Katharina Riebel, Daniel J. Mennill, Lauryn Benedict, J. Jordan Price, Marcelo Araya‐Salas, Michael S. Webster and David M. Logue and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Evolution and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Karan J. Odom

32 papers receiving 899 citations

Hit Papers

Female song is widespread... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Karan J. Odom United States 15 692 683 492 56 55 32 916
David M. Logue Canada 19 794 1.1× 721 1.1× 383 0.8× 69 1.2× 104 1.9× 44 977
Andrew M. R. Terry Denmark 9 569 0.8× 565 0.8× 373 0.8× 96 1.7× 55 1.0× 10 825
Sándor Zsebők Hungary 16 506 0.7× 315 0.5× 304 0.6× 70 1.3× 65 1.2× 48 668
Lauryn Benedict United States 16 633 0.9× 570 0.8× 397 0.8× 91 1.6× 43 0.8× 46 805
Anastasia H. Dalziell Australia 13 522 0.8× 456 0.7× 283 0.6× 45 0.8× 57 1.0× 27 630
Fanny Rybak France 16 551 0.8× 497 0.7× 398 0.8× 44 0.8× 147 2.7× 32 817
Benjamin J. Pitcher Australia 19 567 0.8× 546 0.8× 593 1.2× 124 2.2× 151 2.7× 41 1.0k
Bernard Lohr United States 15 585 0.8× 684 1.0× 615 1.3× 18 0.3× 39 0.7× 38 883
Nigel I. Mann United Kingdom 17 754 1.1× 715 1.0× 416 0.8× 92 1.6× 58 1.1× 21 889
David Wheatcroft Sweden 21 696 1.0× 617 0.9× 395 0.8× 119 2.1× 147 2.7× 36 998

Countries citing papers authored by Karan J. Odom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karan J. Odom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karan J. Odom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karan J. Odom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karan J. Odom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karan J. Odom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karan J. Odom. The network helps show where Karan J. Odom may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karan J. Odom

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karan J. Odom. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karan J. Odom based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karan J. Odom. Karan J. Odom is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Odom, Karan J., Marcelo Araya‐Salas, Lauryn Benedict, et al.. (2025). Global incidence of female birdsong is predicted by territoriality and biparental care in songbirds. Nature Communications. 16(1). 6157–6157. 1 indexed citations
3.
Hsu, Magnus T. L., et al.. (2025). Deep machine learning allows classification of male and female songbird songs in a species with highly variable repertoires. Behaviour. 162(10-11). 709–743. 1 indexed citations
4.
Odom, Karan J., et al.. (2024). Display court ecology in male Albert’s Lyrebirds. Emu - Austral Ornithology. 125(1). 80–87. 2 indexed citations
6.
Odom, Karan J., Marcelo Araya‐Salas, Janelle L. Morano, et al.. (2021). Comparative bioacoustics: a roadmap for quantifying and comparing animal sounds across diverse taxa. Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 96(4). 1135–1159. 39 indexed citations
7.
Odom, Karan J., et al.. (2021). Correlated evolution of distinct signals associated with increased social selection in female white‐shouldered fairywrens. Ecology and Evolution. 11(23). 17352–17363. 4 indexed citations
8.
Keen, Sara, et al.. (2021). A machine learning approach for classifying and quantifying acoustic diversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 12(7). 1213–1225. 32 indexed citations
9.
Odom, Karan J., Kristal E. Cain, Michelle L. Hall, et al.. (2021). Sex role similarity and sexual selection predict male and female song elaboration and dimorphism in fairy‐wrens. Ecology and Evolution. 11(24). 17901–17919. 14 indexed citations
10.
Odom, Karan J., Marcelo Araya‐Salas, Kyle G. Horton, et al.. (2020). Breeding season length predicts duet coordination and consistency in Neotropical wrens (Troglodytidae). Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 287(1941). 20202482–20202482. 9 indexed citations
12.
Wilkins, Matthew R., Karan J. Odom, Lauryn Benedict, & Rebecca J. Safran. (2020). Analysis of female song provides insight into the evolution of sex differences in a widely studied songbird. Animal Behaviour. 168. 69–82. 19 indexed citations
13.
Riebel, Katharina, Karan J. Odom, Naomi E. Langmore, & Michelle L. Hall. (2019). New insights from female bird song: towards an integrated approach to studying male and female communication roles. Biology Letters. 15(4). 96 indexed citations
14.
Odom, Karan J., et al.. (2017). Duetting behavior varies with sex, season, and singing role in a tropical oriole (Icterus icterus). Behavioral Ecology. 28(5). 1256–1265. 22 indexed citations
15.
Muellerklein, Oliver, et al.. (2016). Documentation of female song in a newly recognized species, the Puerto Rican Oriole (<em>Icterus portoricensis</em>). Journal of Caribbean Ornithology. 29. 28–36. 7 indexed citations
16.
Odom, Karan J., Michelle L. Hall, Katharina Riebel, Kevin E. Omland, & Naomi E. Langmore. (2014). Female song is widespread and ancestral in songbirds. Nature Communications. 5(1). 3379–3379. 286 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Odom, Karan J., Kevin E. Omland, & J. Jordan Price. (2014). Differentiating the evolution of female song and male-female duets in the New World blackbirds: Can tropical natural history traits explain duet evolution?. Evolution. 69(3). 839–847. 38 indexed citations
18.
Odom, Karan J., Michelle L. Hall, Katharina Riebel, Kevin E. Omland, & Naomi E. Langmore. (2014). Data from: Female song is widespread and ancestral in songbirds. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 3 indexed citations
19.
Odom, Karan J. & Daniel J. Mennill. (2012). Inconsistent geographic variation in the calls and duets of Barred Owls (Strix varia) across an area of genetic introgression. The Auk. 129(3). 387–398. 11 indexed citations
20.
Mennill, Daniel J. & Karan J. Odom. (2010). Vocal duets in a nonpasserine: an examination of territory defence and neighbour–stranger discrimination in a neighbourhood of barred owls. Behaviour. 147(5-6). 619–639. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026