Kaleigh Smith
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Media Technology top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design top 5%
- Co-authors
- Karol MyszkowskiJoëlle ThollotHans‐Peter SeidelDerek MageeD. CrellinDarren TreanorMichael ShiresPhilip Quirke
- Topics
- Image Enhancement Techniques (5 papers)Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (4 papers)Advanced Vision and Imaging (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided DesignComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionMedia Technology
- Journals
- ACM Transactions on GraphicsComputer Graphics ForumHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
In The Last Decade
Kaleigh Smith
9 papers receiving 306 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 260
- Media Technology 98
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 77
- Artificial Intelligence 75
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 68
Countries citing papers authored by Kaleigh Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Kaleigh Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kaleigh Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kaleigh Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kaleigh Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kaleigh Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kaleigh Smith. The network helps show where Kaleigh Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kaleigh Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kaleigh Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kaleigh Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kaleigh Smith. Kaleigh Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Automatic Pen-and-Ink Illustration of Tone, Gloss, And Texture | 2 |
| 3 | Colour Normalisation in Digital Histopathology Images | 85 |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 132 | |
| 6 | 40 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 20 |
About Kaleigh Smith
Kaleigh Smith is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Media Technology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 9 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Image Enhancement Techniques (5 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (4 papers) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (68 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (260 citations) and Media Technology (98 citations). Kaleigh Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Karol Myszkowski, Joëlle Thollot, Hans‐Peter Seidel, Derek Magee, D. Crellin, Darren Treanor, Michael Shires, Philip Quirke, Tobias Ritschel and Thorsten Grosch. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Graphics, Computer Graphics Forum and HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.