Kait Clark

937 total citations
19 papers, 520 citations indexed

About

Kait Clark is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kait Clark has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 520 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Social Psychology and 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Kait Clark's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (4 papers). Kait Clark is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (4 papers). Kait Clark collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Kait Clark's co-authors include Stephen R. Mitroff, Matthew S. Cain, Mathias S. Fleck, Edward Vul, Adam T. Biggs, Marty G. Woldorff, Lawrence G. Appelbaum, Stephen H. Adamo, Elise F. Darling and Kerry Jordan and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Neurophysiology and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Kait Clark

19 papers receiving 506 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Kait Clark United States	13	286	149	109	62	55	19	520
Masashi Komori Japan	10	241 0.8×	231 1.6×	134 1.2×	23 0.4×	10 0.2×	38	534
Damien Litchfield United Kingdom	16	198 0.7×	188 1.3×	76 0.7×	59 1.0×	104 1.9×	26	556
Rebecca L. Achtman United States	8	505 1.8×	190 1.3×	58 0.5×	111 1.8×	41 0.7×	10	723
Rinus G. Verdonschot Japan	15	485 1.7×	329 2.2×	97 0.9×	354 5.7×	34 0.6×	64	841
Jun Yin China	13	392 1.4×	109 0.7×	213 2.0×	115 1.9×	20 0.4×	68	624
Kai Hamburger Germany	17	367 1.3×	135 0.9×	129 1.2×	94 1.5×	11 0.2×	52	706
John Christie Canada	15	575 2.0×	132 0.9×	117 1.1×	92 1.5×	14 0.3×	32	713
Elise F. Darling United States	6	131 0.5×	85 0.6×	67 0.6×	57 0.9×	23 0.4×	9	289
Josh P. Davis United Kingdom	15	598 2.1×	257 1.7×	174 1.6×	19 0.3×	15 0.3×	45	800
John R. Pani United States	17	214 0.7×	199 1.3×	80 0.7×	200 3.2×	19 0.3×	36	813

Countries citing papers authored by Kait Clark

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kait Clark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kait Clark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kait Clark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kait Clark

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kait Clark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kait Clark. The network helps show where Kait Clark may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kait Clark

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kait Clark. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kait Clark based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kait Clark. Kait Clark is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

Pennington, Charlotte R., et al.. (2025). Are we capturing individual differences? Evaluating the test–retest reliability of experimental tasks used to measure social cognitive abilities. Behavior Research Methods. 57(2). 82–82. 1 indexed citations

Clark, Kait, et al.. (2022). Test-retest reliability for common tasks in vision science. Journal of Vision. 22(8). 18–18. 12 indexed citations

Clark, Kait, et al.. (2019). Test-retest reliability for common tasks in vision science. Journal of Vision. 19(10). 86d–86d. 1 indexed citations

Malla, Cristina de la, Simon K. Rushton, Kait Clark, Jeroen B. J. Smeets, & Eli Brenner. (2019). The predictability of a target’s motion influences gaze, head, and hand movements when trying to intercept it. Journal of Neurophysiology. 121(6). 2416–2427. 17 indexed citations

Clark, Kait, et al.. (2018). Enhanced visual attention in university hockey players. Journal of Vision. 18(10). 1120–1120. 2 indexed citations

Biggs, Adam T., Kait Clark, & Stephen R. Mitroff. (2017). Who should be searching? Differences in personality can affect visual search accuracy. Personality and Individual Differences. 116. 353–358. 23 indexed citations

Appelbaum, Lawrence G., et al.. (2016). Visual search performance is predicted by both prestimulus and poststimulus electrical brain activity. Scientific Reports. 6(1). 37718–37718. 32 indexed citations

Clark, Kait, et al.. (2015). Improvement in Visual Search with Practice: Mapping Learning-Related Changes in Neurocognitive Stages of Processing. Journal of Neuroscience. 35(13). 5351–5359. 33 indexed citations

Mitroff, Stephen R., et al.. (2014). What can 1 billion trials tell us about visual search?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 41(1). 1–5. 37 indexed citations

10.

Jackson, Tate H., Kait Clark, & Stephen R. Mitroff. (2013). Enhanced facial symmetry assessment in orthodontists. Visual Cognition. 21(7). 838–852. 7 indexed citations

11.

Clark, Kait, Matthew S. Cain, R. Alison Adcock, & Stephen R. Mitroff. (2013). Context matters: The structure of task goals affects accuracy in multiple-target visual search. Applied Ergonomics. 45(3). 528–533. 16 indexed citations

12.

Jackson, Tate H., Stephen R. Mitroff, Kait Clark, et al.. (2013). Face symmetry assessment abilities: Clinical implications for diagnosing asymmetry. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 144(5). 663–671. 25 indexed citations

13.

Biggs, Adam T., Matthew S. Cain, Kait Clark, Elise F. Darling, & Stephen R. Mitroff. (2013). Assessing visual search performance differences between Transportation Security Administration Officers and nonprofessional visual searchers. Visual Cognition. 21(3). 330–352. 54 indexed citations

14.

Clark, Kait, Matthew S. Cain, Stephen H. Adamo, & Stephen R. Mitroff. (2012). Overcoming Hurdles in Translating Visual Search Research Between the Lab and the Field. PubMed. 59. 147–181. 27 indexed citations

15.

Cain, Matthew S., Edward Vul, Kait Clark, & Stephen R. Mitroff. (2012). A Bayesian Optimal Foraging Model of Human Visual Search. Psychological Science. 23(9). 1047–1054. 102 indexed citations

16.

Clark, Kait, et al.. (2011). Expertise in radiological screening and satisfaction of search. UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol). 4 indexed citations

17.

Cain, Matthew S., Ed Vul, Kait Clark, & Stephen R. Mitroff. (2011). An Optimal Foraging Model of Human Visual Search. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 33(33). 1 indexed citations

18.

Clark, Kait, Mathias S. Fleck, & Stephen R. Mitroff. (2010). Enhanced change detection performance reveals improved strategy use in avid action video game players. Acta Psychologica. 136(1). 67–72. 95 indexed citations

19.

Jordan, Kerry, Kait Clark, & Stephen R. Mitroff. (2010). See an object, hear an object file: Object correspondence transcends sensory modality. Visual Cognition. 18(4). 492–503. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact