K.A.F. Gration

1.2k total citations
24 papers, 879 citations indexed

About

K.A.F. Gration is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, K.A.F. Gration has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 879 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Molecular Biology, 13 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 8 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in K.A.F. Gration's work include Ion channel regulation and function (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (7 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers). K.A.F. Gration is often cited by papers focused on Ion channel regulation and function (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (7 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers). K.A.F. Gration collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. K.A.F. Gration's co-authors include P.N.R. Usherwood, Ian Harrow, Joseph B. Patlak, Jeremy J. Lambert, N. A. Evans, A. C. Goudie, R.P. Rand, MICHAEL S. PACEY, David A. Perry and Dave J Seymour and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, The Journal of Physiology and Brain Research.

In The Last Decade

K.A.F. Gration

24 papers receiving 816 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
K.A.F. Gration United Kingdom 15 442 423 210 189 106 24 879
Adrian T. Rogers United Kingdom 7 249 0.6× 108 0.3× 158 0.8× 107 0.6× 142 1.3× 16 661
Rodney A. Webb Canada 20 267 0.6× 417 1.0× 143 0.7× 89 0.5× 379 3.6× 63 972
Jon H. Hayashi United States 10 119 0.3× 238 0.6× 132 0.6× 185 1.0× 132 1.2× 13 532
Philip S. Paress United States 12 611 1.4× 322 0.8× 388 1.8× 291 1.5× 353 3.3× 14 1.6k
J.W. Bowman United States 18 238 0.5× 322 0.8× 98 0.5× 133 0.7× 172 1.6× 22 792
Michael D. Squire United States 10 319 0.7× 161 0.4× 80 0.4× 214 1.1× 91 0.9× 25 777
D.J.A. Brownlee United Kingdom 14 125 0.3× 172 0.4× 83 0.4× 59 0.3× 173 1.6× 24 521
C.A. Winterrowd United States 13 170 0.4× 85 0.2× 235 1.1× 62 0.3× 216 2.0× 16 584
Ralph A. Pax United States 23 375 0.8× 376 0.9× 488 2.3× 70 0.4× 813 7.7× 71 1.7k
Paul McVeigh United Kingdom 22 384 0.9× 168 0.4× 353 1.7× 128 0.7× 590 5.6× 47 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by K.A.F. Gration

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K.A.F. Gration's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K.A.F. Gration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K.A.F. Gration more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K.A.F. Gration

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K.A.F. Gration. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K.A.F. Gration. The network helps show where K.A.F. Gration may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of K.A.F. Gration

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K.A.F. Gration. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K.A.F. Gration based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K.A.F. Gration. K.A.F. Gration is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Phipps, Alex, et al.. (2005). Disposition of 3H-selamectin and 3H-ivermectin in the brain of the cat flea Ctenocephalides felis felis using micro-image analysis. Veterinary Parasitology. 131(1-2). 89–94. 5 indexed citations
2.
McTier, Tom L., et al.. (2003). Comparison of the activity of selamectin, fipronil, and imidacloprid against flea larvae (Ctenocephalides felis felis) in vitro. Veterinary Parasitology. 116(1). 45–50. 10 indexed citations
3.
Evans, N. A., et al.. (2000). Avermectins and flea control: structure–activity relationships and the selection of selamectin for development as an endectocide for companion animals. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 8(8). 2017–2025. 28 indexed citations
4.
Evans, N. A., A. C. Goudie, K.A.F. Gration, et al.. (2000). Selamectin: a novel broad-spectrum endectocide for dogs and cats. Veterinary Parasitology. 91(3-4). 163–176. 84 indexed citations
5.
Goudie, A. C., N. A. Evans, K.A.F. Gration, et al.. (1993). Doramectin — a potent novel endectocide. Veterinary Parasitology. 49(1). 5–15. 124 indexed citations
6.
Gration, K.A.F., et al.. (1992). A new anthelmintic ussay using rats infected with Trichostrongylus colubriformis. Veterinary Parasitology. 42(3-4). 273–279. 3 indexed citations
7.
Martin, Richard J., Peter Thorn, K.A.F. Gration, & Ian Harrow. (1992). Voltage-Activated Currents in Somatic Muscle of the Nematode Parasite Ascaris Suum. Journal of Experimental Biology. 173(1). 75–90. 16 indexed citations
8.
Harrow, Ian, K.A.F. Gration, & N. A. Evans. (1991). Neurobiology of arthropod parasites. Parasitology. 102(S1). S59–S69. 15 indexed citations
9.
Pinnock, R.D., David B. Sattelle, K.A.F. Gration, & Ian Harrow. (1988). Actions of potent cholinergic anthelmintics (morantel, pyrantel and levamisole) on an identified insect neurone reveal pharmacological differences between nematode and insect acetylcholine receptors. Neuropharmacology. 27(8). 843–848. 12 indexed citations
10.
Harrow, Ian & K.A.F. Gration. (1985). Mode of action of the anthelmintics morantel, pyrantel and levamisole on muscle cell membrane of the nematode Ascaris suum. Pesticide Science. 16(6). 662–672. 110 indexed citations
11.
Gration, K.A.F., et al.. (1982). Influence of sodium and calcium ions and membrane potential on glutamate receptor desensitization. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Comparative Pharmacology. 72(1). 1–7. 6 indexed citations
12.
Gration, K.A.F., Jeremy J. Lambert, & P.N.R. Usherwood. (1981). A comparison of glutamate single-channel activity at desensitizing and non-desensitizing sites. The Journal of Physiology. 310. 4 indexed citations
13.
Gration, K.A.F., et al.. (1981). Agonist potency determination by patch clamp analysis of single glutamate receptors. Brain Research. 230(1-2). 400–405. 31 indexed citations
14.
Anis, Nabil A., et al.. (1981). Influence of agonists on desensitization of glutamate receptors on locust muscle.. The Journal of Physiology. 312(1). 345–364. 24 indexed citations
15.
Gration, K.A.F., et al.. (1981). Non-random openings and concentration-dependent lifetimes of glutamate-gated channels in muscle membrane. Nature. 291(5814). 423–425. 44 indexed citations
16.
Gration, K.A.F., et al.. (1980). Influence of glutamate and aspartate on time course of decay of excitatory synaptic currents at locust neuromuscular junctions. Brain Research. 192(1). 205–216. 16 indexed citations
17.
Gration, K.A.F., et al.. (1979). Desensitization of glutamate receptors on innervated and denervated locust muscle fibres.. The Journal of Physiology. 290(2). 551–568. 29 indexed citations
18.
Gration, K.A.F., et al.. (1979). RESPONSES TO dl‐IBOTENIC ACID AT LOCUST GLUTAMATERGIC NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTIONS. British Journal of Pharmacology. 66(2). 267–273. 14 indexed citations
19.
Gration, K.A.F., et al.. (1979). Three types of L-glutamate receptor on junctional membrane of locust muscle fibres. Brain Research. 171(2). 360–364. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026