K.A. Newton

1.1k citations
43 papers · 775 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

K.A. Newton

42 papers receiving 665 citations

Peers

K.A. Newton
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Oncology 281
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 264
  • Rheumatology 112
  • Otorhinolaryngology 25
  • Dermatology 50
Replace John T. Godwin with:
John T. Godwin United States
Theodor B. Grage United States
W. E. C. Allt Canada
H Beerman Netherlands
Abe M Japan
Ketcham As United States
Mark D. Hafermann United States
Dennis Borochovitz United States
M. V. Williams United Kingdom
Munehisa Imaizumi Japan
K.A. Newton relative to John T. Godwin United States John T. Godwin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
John T. Godwin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K.A. Newton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K.A. Newton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K.A. Newton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K.A. Newton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K.A. Newton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K.A. Newton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K.A. Newton. The network helps show where K.A. Newton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K.A. Newton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K.A. Newton Line = papers co-authored together K.A. Newton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197098
2 197068
3 196943
4 195741
5 196940
6 198340
7 197137
8 197936
9 197430
10 198828
11 197426
12 196225
13 197624
14 197322
15 198022
16 195819
17 195918
18 197918
19 195916
20 197816

About K.A. Newton

K.A. Newton is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Oncology, Molecular Biology and Epidemiology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 775 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (4 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (3 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (3 papers), Hematological disorders and diagnostics (3 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (2 papers) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (281 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (264 citations), Rheumatology (112 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (25 citations) and Dermatology (50 citations). K.A. Newton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include G Westbury, Margaret F Spittle, D. H. Mackenzie, J G Humble, I. W. F. Hanham, Spyros Retsas, K. Hellmann, George Lumb, B. W. Lacey and D.E. Pegg. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Cancer, British Journal of Radiology, The Lancet and Clinical Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact