K. Wade Foster
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Dermatology top 1%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Genetics top 10%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Boni E. ElewskiMahmoud A. GhannoumWenquan WangJulie HarperWendy C. CantrellJ. Michael RuppertAndra R. FrostWilliam E. Grizzle
- Topics
- Cancer-related gene regulation (4 papers)Kruppel-like factors research (4 papers)Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (3 papers)
- Cited by
- DermatologyCell BiologyGenetics
- Partner nations
- United StatesPortugal
In The Last Decade
K. Wade Foster
15 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Molecular Biology 699
- Dermatology 492
- Epidemiology 361
- Genetics 316
- Cell Biology 267
Countries citing papers authored by K. Wade Foster
This map shows the geographic impact of K. Wade Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Wade Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Wade Foster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K. Wade Foster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Wade Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Wade Foster. The network helps show where K. Wade Foster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Wade Foster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Wade Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Wade Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. Wade Foster. K. Wade Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 81 | |
| 5 | Reductions in thigh and infraumbilical circumference following treatment with a novel device combining ultrasound, suction, and massage. | 9 |
| 6 | 405 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 162 | |
| 10 | 65 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 177 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 188 | |
| 15 | 54 | |
| 16 | Increase of GKLF messenger RNA and protein expression during progression of breast cancer. | 202 |
| 17 | Oncogene expression cloning by retroviral transduction of adenovirus E1A-immortalized rat kidney RK3E cells: transformation of a host with epithelial features by c-MYC and the zinc finger protein GKLF. | 162 |
About K. Wade Foster
K. Wade Foster is a scholar working on Dermatology, Sensory Systems and Molecular Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related gene regulation (4 papers), Kruppel-like factors research (4 papers) and Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (492 citations), Cell Biology (267 citations) and Genetics (316 citations). K. Wade Foster has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Boni E. Elewski, Mahmoud A. Ghannoum, Wenquan Wang, Julie Harper, Wendy C. Cantrell, J. Michael Ruppert, Andra R. Frost, William E. Grizzle, Susan M. Lobo-Ruppert and Craig A. Elmets. Their work appears in journals such as Oncogene, Science Translational Medicine and Journal of Investigative Dermatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.