K. Toms

34.5k total citations
11 papers, 49 citations indexed

About

K. Toms is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, K. Toms has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 49 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 5 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 5 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in K. Toms's work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (6 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (5 papers). K. Toms is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Mechanics and Applications (6 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (5 papers). K. Toms collaborates with scholars based in Russia, United States and Czechia. K. Toms's co-authors include N. Nikitin, V. Sotnikov, Dmitri Melikhov, A. Danilina, N. Nikitin, P. Řezníček, S. Yu. Sivoklokov, M. Smižanská, S. Yu. Sivoklokov and D. A. Tlisov and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review A, Physical review. D and Physical review. A.

In The Last Decade

K. Toms

10 papers receiving 47 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
K. Toms Russia	4	35	15	10	7	4	11	49
K. Piscicchia Italy	4	16 0.5×	32 2.1×	19 1.9×	6 0.9×	6 1.5×	7	46
K. Ehatäht Estonia	2	17 0.5×	17 1.1×	8 0.8×	2 0.3×	6 1.5×	3	31
B. Mitrica Romania	5	30 0.9×	14 0.9×	6 0.6×	7 1.0×		12	44
E. Cattaruzza Italy	4	55 1.6×	10 0.7×	6 0.6×	10 1.4×		12	67
Richard Gray New Zealand	3	34 1.0×	19 1.3×	6 0.6×	12 1.7×		4	50
P. Kurashvili Poland	4	29 0.8×	15 1.0×	10 1.0×	3 0.4×		6	42
Chen Qian China	4	15 0.4×	18 1.2×	13 1.3×	2 0.3×	2 0.5×	7	34
J. Gao United States	5	32 0.9×	20 1.3×	3 0.3×	6 0.9×		15	50
J. Martens Netherlands	2	13 0.4×	10 0.7×	6 0.6×	3 0.4×		2	20
C. Petridou Greece	5	49 1.4×	8 0.5×	4 0.4×	3 0.4×		16	57

Countries citing papers authored by K. Toms

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Toms's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Toms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Toms more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Toms

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Toms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Toms. The network helps show where K. Toms may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Toms

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Toms. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Toms based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. Toms. K. Toms is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Danilina, A., N. Nikitin, & K. Toms. (2020). Decays of charged B mesons into three charged leptons and a neutrino. Physical review. D. 101(9). 10 indexed citations

2.

Nikitin, N. V. & K. Toms. (2020). The Monogamy of Entanglement and the Impossibility of the Creation of a Quantum Ansible. Moscow University Physics Bulletin. 75(6). 541–546.

3.

Nikitin, N. & K. Toms. (2019). Wigner inequalities for testing the hypothesis of realism and concepts of macroscopic and local realism. Physical review. A. 100(6). 3 indexed citations

4.

Nikitin, N. & K. Toms. (2017). Test of a hypothesis of realism in quantum theory using a Bayesian approach. Physical review. A. 95(5). 1 indexed citations

5.

Nikitin, N., V. Sotnikov, & K. Toms. (2015). Proposal for experimental test of the time-dependent Wigner inequalities for neutral pseudoscalar meson systems. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 92(1). 9 indexed citations

6.

Nikitin, N., V. Sotnikov, & K. Toms. (2015). Investigation of properties of time-dependent bell inequalities in Wigner’s form for nonstationary and open quantum systems. Physics of Atomic Nuclei. 78(7). 805–830. 2 indexed citations

7.

Nikitin, N., V. Sotnikov, & K. Toms. (2014). Time-dependent Bell inequalities in a Wigner form. Physical Review A. 90(4). 5 indexed citations

8.

Sivoklokov, S. Yu., et al.. (2007). Possibility of recording rare muonic decays of B mesons at the ATLAS detector in the case of LHC operation in the initial-luminosity mode. Physics of Atomic Nuclei. 70(12). 2086–2102. 1 indexed citations

9.

Řezníček, P., et al.. (2006). Potential of Rare B-decays in ATLAS. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements. 163. 147–152. 2 indexed citations

10.

Nikitin, N., P. Řezníček, S. Yu. Sivoklokov, et al.. (2006). Rare B-decays at ATLAS. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements. 156(1). 119–123. 3 indexed citations

11.

Melikhov, Dmitri, et al.. (2005). Rare radiative leptonic decays B d,s 0 → ℓ+ℓ− γ. Physics of Atomic Nuclei. 68(11). 1842–1850. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact