Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
GAIA: Composition, formation and evolution of the Galaxy
2001623 citationsK. S. de Boer et al.Astronomy and Astrophysicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of K. S. de Boer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. S. de Boer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. S. de Boer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. S. de Boer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. S. de Boer. The network helps show where K. S. de Boer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. S. de Boer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. S. de Boer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. S. de Boer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with K. S. de Boer. K. S. de Boer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Richter, P., K. S. de Boer, D. J. Bomans, et al.. (1999). ORFEUS II echelle spectra: On the H-2/CO ratio in LMC gas towards LH 10. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 351(1). 323–329.1 indexed citations
10.
Wakker, Bart P., Hugo van Woerden, U. J. Schwarz, et al.. (1996). Distance and Metallicity of HVCs. Symposium - International Astronomical Union. 169. 605–606.
11.
King, David L., G. Vladilo, K. S. de Boer, et al.. (1995). NGC 4526 gas, high velocity clouds, and Galactic halo gas: the interstellar medium towards SN 1994D.. CERN Bulletin. 300. 881.1 indexed citations
12.
Boer, K. S. de, et al.. (1991). Location and thickness of the nearest neutral gas cloud in the direction of Auriga-Perseus.. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 87(3). 471–479.1 indexed citations
13.
Moehler, S., T. Richtler, K. S. de Boer, R.‐J. Dettmar, & U. Heber. (1990). Hot subluminous stars at high galactic latitudes. I, Spectra and Strömgren photometry. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 86(1). 53–74.4 indexed citations
14.
Dreizler, S., U. Heber, K. Werner, S. Moehler, & K. S. de Boer. (1990). Hot subliminous stars at high galactic latitudes. III, Non-LTE analysis of extremely helium rich sdO-stars. 235. 234–241.3 indexed citations
Heber, U., S. Dreizler, K. S. de Boer, S. Moehler, & T. Richtler. (1988). Spectroscopy of helium-rich subluminous O and B stars.. 1. 16.1 indexed citations
17.
Boer, K. S. de, et al.. (1986). Intersstellar absorption lines between 2000 and 3000 A in nearby stars observed with BUSS. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 157(1). 119–128.2 indexed citations
Boer, K. S. de, R. Hoekstra, & K. A. van der Hucht. (1972). UV interstellar absorption lines in the spectrum of zeta Pup.. 21. 447.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.