K Rüdiger

428 total citations
10 papers, 357 citations indexed

About

K Rüdiger is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Small Animals. According to data from OpenAlex, K Rüdiger has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 357 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 3 papers in Small Animals. Recurrent topics in K Rüdiger's work include Sperm and Testicular Function (7 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers) and Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (2 papers). K Rüdiger is often cited by papers focused on Sperm and Testicular Function (7 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers) and Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (2 papers). K Rüdiger collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Japan. K Rüdiger's co-authors include Martin Schulze, Dagmar Waberski, Markus Jung, Heiko Henning, Mirjam Grobbel, Christian Ammon, Martin Beyerbach, Anja Riesenbeck, R. Großfeld and K. Müller and has published in prestigious journals such as Theriogenology, Animal Reproduction Science and The Veterinary Journal.

In The Last Decade

K Rüdiger

10 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
K Rüdiger Germany 8 306 182 70 69 67 10 357
Anja Riesenbeck Germany 8 263 0.9× 191 1.0× 78 1.1× 106 1.5× 59 0.9× 13 386
P. Vyt Belgium 9 328 1.1× 228 1.3× 74 1.1× 79 1.1× 50 0.7× 12 416
Alfonso López Rodríguez Belgium 9 177 0.6× 112 0.6× 62 0.9× 49 0.7× 31 0.5× 10 312
Christopher E. Kuster United States 8 460 1.5× 326 1.8× 85 1.2× 75 1.1× 84 1.3× 9 557
P Saratsis Greece 10 333 1.1× 260 1.4× 81 1.2× 132 1.9× 35 0.5× 17 488
Junpen Suwimonteerabutr Thailand 10 136 0.4× 118 0.6× 47 0.7× 110 1.6× 13 0.2× 72 368
J.M. Parlevliet Netherlands 14 267 0.9× 208 1.1× 66 0.9× 192 2.8× 11 0.2× 23 433
Georgios Tsousis Greece 13 108 0.4× 107 0.6× 178 2.5× 269 3.9× 20 0.3× 44 441
I.M. Ghoneim Egypt 12 214 0.7× 238 1.3× 92 1.3× 191 2.8× 8 0.1× 51 503
M.S. Ferrer United States 11 141 0.5× 132 0.7× 52 0.7× 114 1.7× 4 0.1× 35 274

Countries citing papers authored by K Rüdiger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K Rüdiger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K Rüdiger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K Rüdiger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K Rüdiger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K Rüdiger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K Rüdiger. The network helps show where K Rüdiger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of K Rüdiger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K Rüdiger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K Rüdiger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K Rüdiger. K Rüdiger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Schulze, Martin, Christian Ammon, Gerd Nürnberg, et al.. (2015). Field study analysis of the influences of deworming regimens and housing conditions on parasites and sperm output in 21 European boar studs. The Veterinary Journal. 209. 186–189. 3 indexed citations
2.
Jung, Markus, K Rüdiger, & Martin Schulze. (2015). In Vitro Measures for Assessing Boar Semen Fertility. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 50(S2). 20–24. 40 indexed citations
3.
Riesenbeck, Anja, Martin Schulze, K Rüdiger, Heiko Henning, & Dagmar Waberski. (2015). Quality Control of Boar Sperm Processing: Implications from European AI Centres and Two Spermatology Reference Laboratories. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 50(S2). 1–4. 36 indexed citations
4.
Schulze, Martin, K Rüdiger, & Dagmar Waberski. (2015). Rotation of Boar Semen Doses During Storage Affects Sperm Quality. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 50(4). 684–687. 36 indexed citations
5.
Schulze, Martin, Mirjam Grobbel, K. Müller, et al.. (2015). Challenges and Limits Using Antimicrobial Peptides in Boar Semen Preservation. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 50(S2). 5–10. 16 indexed citations
6.
Schulze, Martin, Christian Ammon, K Rüdiger, Markus Jung, & Mirjam Grobbel. (2014). Analysis of hygienic critical control points in boar semen production. Theriogenology. 83(3). 430–437. 76 indexed citations
7.
Schulze, Martin, et al.. (2014). Influences on semen traits used for selection of young AI boars. Animal Reproduction Science. 148(3-4). 164–170. 64 indexed citations
8.
Schulze, Martin, K Rüdiger, Markus Jung, & R. Großfeld. (2014). Use of refractometry as a new management tool in AI boar centers for quality assurance of extender preparations. Animal Reproduction Science. 152. 77–82. 15 indexed citations
9.
Schulze, Martin, et al.. (2013). Temperature management during semen processing: Impact on boar sperm quality under laboratory and field conditions. Theriogenology. 80(9). 990–998. 70 indexed citations
10.
Rüdiger, K, et al.. (1980). Appropriate mineral fertilizer application - a prerequisite for high yields and good quality in carrots.. 27(6). 168–169. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026