K. Mota Amarilo

4.3k total citations
2 papers, 19 citations indexed

About

K. Mota Amarilo is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, K. Mota Amarilo has authored 2 papers receiving a total of 19 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and 0 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in K. Mota Amarilo's work include Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (2 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers) and Relativity and Gravitational Theory (1 paper). K. Mota Amarilo is often cited by papers focused on Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (2 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers) and Relativity and Gravitational Theory (1 paper). K. Mota Amarilo collaborates with scholars based in Brazil and Spain. K. Mota Amarilo's co-authors include M. Barroso Ferreira Filho, A. A. Araújo Filho and R. V. Maluf and has published in prestigious journals such as Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

K. Mota Amarilo

2 papers receiving 19 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h				Papers	Cites
K. Mota Amarilo Brazil	2	18	14	13	2	19
M. Barroso Ferreira Filho Brazil	2	18 1.0×	14 1.0×	13 1.0×	2	19
Sangwha Yi	3	20 1.1×	14 1.0×	11 0.8×	22	21
Grant Teply United States	2	25 1.4×	22 1.6×	13 1.0×	2	30
L. Bellagamba Italy	2	10 0.6×	14 1.0×	8 0.6×	6	14
S. Fuenzalida Garrido Chile	2	18 1.0×	18 1.3×	5 0.4×	2	18
Micha Moskovic Belgium	4	26 1.4×	30 2.1×	17 1.3×	4	30
I. Rienäcker Switzerland	2	7 0.4×	17 1.2×	13 1.0×	4	19
M. Ripka Germany	2	13 0.7×	22 1.6×	5 0.4×	2	22
A. Gent United States	2	8 0.4×	11 0.8×	10 0.8×	3	19
Pierros Ntelis France	3	38 2.1×	17 1.2×	5 0.4×	7	40

Countries citing papers authored by K. Mota Amarilo

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Mota Amarilo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Mota Amarilo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Mota Amarilo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Mota Amarilo

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Mota Amarilo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Mota Amarilo. The network helps show where K. Mota Amarilo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Mota Amarilo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Mota Amarilo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Mota Amarilo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. Mota Amarilo. K. Mota Amarilo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

2 of 2 papers shown

1.

Amarilo, K. Mota, et al.. (2024). Gravitational waves effects in a Lorentz–violating scenario. Physics Letters B. 855. 138785–138785. 16 indexed citations

2.

Amarilo, K. Mota, M. Barroso Ferreira Filho, & R. V. Maluf. (2019). Modification in Gravitational Waves Production Triggered by Spontaneous Lorentz Violation. 15–15. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact