K. Laurent
About
In The Last Decade
K. Laurent
5 papers receiving 206 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Molecular Biology 93
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 65
- Physiology 64
- Surgery 47
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 36
Countries citing papers authored by K. Laurent
This map shows the geographic impact of K. Laurent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Laurent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Laurent more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K. Laurent
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Laurent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Laurent. The network helps show where K. Laurent may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Laurent
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Laurent. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Laurent based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. Laurent. K. Laurent is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 47 | |
| 3 | 69 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | Interspecies differences in the cardiac negative inotropic effects of beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonists. | 77 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.