K. -E. Hellwig

511 citations
16 papers · 284 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

K. -E. Hellwig

16 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers

K. -E. Hellwig
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 108
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 240
  • Artificial Intelligence 168
  • History and Philosophy of Science 18
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 43
Replace George Svetlichny with:
George Svetlichny Brazil
Roberto Laura Argentina
Maciej Mączyński Poland
Alexander Wilce United States
Mladen Pavičić Croatia
L. Lanz Italy
A. K. Pan India
Kari Ylinen Finland
Claudio Garola Italy
Graciela Domenech Argentina
K. -E. Hellwig relative to George Svetlichny Brazil George Svetlichny's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
George Svetlichny · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K. -E. Hellwig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. -E. Hellwig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. -E. Hellwig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. -E. Hellwig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. -E. Hellwig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. -E. Hellwig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. -E. Hellwig. The network helps show where K. -E. Hellwig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside K. -E. Hellwig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K. -E. Hellwig Line = papers co-authored together K. -E. Hellwig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 197072
2 196969
3 197065
4 199819
5 197712
6 196910
7 19939
8 19955
9 19744
10 19954
11 19774
12 19743
13 19833
14 19762
15
Conditional expectations and duals of instruments
19812
16 19931

About K. -E. Hellwig

K. -E. Hellwig is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (10 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (6 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (4 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (3 papers), Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (2 papers), History and advancements in chemistry (2 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (1 paper) and Fuzzy Systems and Optimization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (108 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (240 citations), Artificial Intelligence (168 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (18 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (43 citations). K. -E. Hellwig has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Mexico and Poland. Frequent co-authors include K. Kraus, S. Bugajski, Paul Busch, S. M. Chumakov and Ana Leonor Rivera. Their work appears in journals such as Communications in Mathematical Physics, Physics Letters A, Annalen der Physik, International Journal of Theoretical Physics and Journal of Mathematical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact