K. Danell

1.8k total citations
27 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

K. Danell is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, K. Danell has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Ecology, 12 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 8 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in K. Danell's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (12 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (6 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers). K. Danell is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (12 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (6 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers). K. Danell collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Norway and Poland. K. Danell's co-authors include Roger Bergström, Sean M. Blomquist, Lisa A. Shipley, Lars Edenius, John P. Ball, Joakim Hjältén, Roger Pettersson, Heloise Gibb, Christina Skarpe and R. Thomas Palo and has published in prestigious journals such as Oecologia, Journal of Applied Ecology and Biological Conservation.

In The Last Decade

K. Danell

26 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
K. Danell Sweden	17	867	670	374	341	270	27	1.4k
Richard A. Lancia United States	19	1.1k 1.3×	821 1.2×	591 1.6×	342 1.0×	192 0.7×	42	1.7k
Timo Vuorisalo Finland	21	616 0.7×	566 0.8×	414 1.1×	321 0.9×	397 1.5×	58	1.5k
Annika M. Felton Sweden	23	749 0.9×	523 0.8×	490 1.3×	243 0.7×	256 0.9×	57	1.4k
Sonia Saı̈d France	25	1.5k 1.8×	779 1.2×	434 1.2×	145 0.4×	323 1.2×	69	2.0k
Per Angelstam Sweden	24	1.9k 2.2×	1.2k 1.8×	807 2.2×	382 1.1×	482 1.8×	43	2.8k
Francisco Sánchez‐Piñero Spain	22	884 1.0×	656 1.0×	295 0.8×	292 0.9×	519 1.9×	60	1.7k
Charles P. Stone United States	16	712 0.8×	500 0.7×	185 0.5×	228 0.7×	422 1.6×	51	1.3k
Leonard F. Ruggiero United States	24	1.5k 1.7×	495 0.7×	361 1.0×	170 0.5×	234 0.9×	47	1.9k
David Choquenot New Zealand	26	1.4k 1.6×	533 0.8×	362 1.0×	88 0.3×	200 0.7×	51	1.9k
David S. deCalesta United States	16	1.1k 1.3×	856 1.3×	487 1.3×	158 0.5×	102 0.4×	35	1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by K. Danell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Danell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Danell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Danell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Danell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Danell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Danell. The network helps show where K. Danell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Danell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Danell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Danell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. Danell. K. Danell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Skarpe, Christina, et al.. (2012). Of goats and spines – a feeding experiment. African Journal of Range and Forage Science. 29(1). 37–41. 11 indexed citations

Mathisen, Karen Marie, et al.. (2010). Moose density and habitat productivity affects reproduction, growth and species composition in field layer vegetation. Journal of Vegetation Science. 38 indexed citations

Wallgren, Märtha, et al.. (2008). Influence of land use on the abundance of wildlife and livestock in the Kalahari, Botswana. Journal of Arid Environments. 73(3). 314–321. 38 indexed citations

Gibb, Heloise, Jacek Hilszczański, Joakim Hjältén, et al.. (2007). Responses of parasitoids to saproxylic hosts and habitat: a multi-scale study using experimental logs. Oecologia. 155(1). 63–74. 16 indexed citations

Danell, K., et al.. (2006). Large Herbivore Ecology, Ecosystem Dynamics and Conservation. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 250 indexed citations

Gibb, Heloise, Roger Pettersson, Joakim Hjältén, et al.. (2006). Conservation-oriented forestry and early successional saproxylic beetles: Responses of functional groups to manipulated dead wood substrates. Biological Conservation. 129(4). 437–450. 102 indexed citations

Hjältén, Joakim, Therese Johansson, K. Danell, et al.. (2006). The importance of substrate type, shading and scorching for the attractiveness of dead wood to saproxylic beetles. Basic and Applied Ecology. 8(4). 364–376. 56 indexed citations

Ball, John P., et al.. (2006). Sampling saproxylic beetle assemblages in dead wood logs: comparing window and eclector traps to traditional bark sieving and a refinement. Journal of Insect Conservation. 11(2). 99–112. 75 indexed citations

Chapin, F. Stuart, Garry Peterson, Fikret Berkes, et al.. (2004). Resilience and Vulnerability of Northern Regions to Social and Environmental Change. AMBIO. 33(6). 344–349. 142 indexed citations

10.

Sinclair, A. R. E., K. Danell, Charles C. Schwartz, et al.. (2003). Moose in modern integrated ecosystem management - how should the Malawi principles be adapted?. 39. 1–10. 4 indexed citations

11.

Persson, Inga‐Lill, K. Danell, Roger Bergström, Mari Walls, & Timo Vuorisalo. (2000). Disturbance by large herbivores in boreal forests with special reference to moose.. Annales Zoologici Fennici. 37(4). 251–263. 103 indexed citations

12.

Skarpe, Christina, et al.. (2000). Browsing in a heterogeneous savanna. Ecography. 23(5). 632–631. 16 indexed citations

13.

Skarpe, Christina, et al.. (2000). Browsing in a heterogeneons savanna. Ecography. 23(5). 632–640. 42 indexed citations

14.

Shipley, Lisa A., Sean M. Blomquist, & K. Danell. (1998). Diet choices made by free-ranging moose in northern Sweden in relation to plant distribution, chemistry, and morphology. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 76(9). 1722–1733. 153 indexed citations

15.

Danell, K., Roger Bergström, & Lars Edenius. (1994). Effects of Large Mammalian Browsers on Architecture, Biomass, and Nutrients of Woody Plants. Journal of Mammalogy. 75(4). 833–844. 144 indexed citations

16.

Palo, R. Thomas, Roger Bergström, & K. Danell. (1992). Digestibility, Distribution of Phenols, and Fiber at Different Twig Diameters of Birch in Winter. Implication for Browsers. Oikos. 65(3). 450–450. 66 indexed citations

17.

Sandell, M., Mattias Åström, Ola Atlegrim, et al.. (1991). "Cyclic" and "Non-Cyclic" Small Mammal Populations: An Artificial Dichotomy. Oikos. 61(2). 281–281. 17 indexed citations

18.

Danell, K., et al.. (1987). Numerical responses by populations of red fox and mountain hare during an outbreak of sarcoptic mange. Oecologia. 73(4). 533–536. 48 indexed citations

19.

Neuvonen, Seppo, Kjell Danell, & K. Danell. (1987). Does browsing modify the quality of birch foliage for Epirrita. 1 indexed citations

20.

Danell, K. & Kjell Sjöberg. (1978). Habitat selection by breeding ducks in boreal lakes in northern Sweden. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact