David Choquenot

2.4k total citations
51 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

David Choquenot is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, David Choquenot has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 42 papers in Ecology, 17 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 13 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in David Choquenot's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (33 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (20 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers). David Choquenot is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (33 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (20 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers). David Choquenot collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. David Choquenot's co-authors include Wendy A. Ruscoe, Peter Whitehead, David M. J. S. Bowman, David M. Forsyth, John Parkes, Glen Saunders, W. J. Freeland, Dean Yibarbuk, Jeremy Russell‐Smith and A. Fisher and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Ecology and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

In The Last Decade

David Choquenot

50 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

David Choquenot

ECOLO

NLC

GPC

GENET

Michael R. Conover United States

William F. Porter United States

Anne Gunn Canada

B. W. Staines United Kingdom

Bruce D. Leopold United States

M. Noelia Barrios‐García Argentina

François Klein France

Francis J. Singer United States

Sonia Saı̈d France

Nova J. Silvy United States

Michael R. Conover United States

David Choquenot

2.3k ×1.7

ECOLO

511 ×1.0

NLC

608 ×1.7

GPC

233 ×0.9

214 ×0.8

GENET

Citations per year, relative to David Choquenot David Choquenot (= 1×) peers Michael R. Conover

Countries citing papers authored by David Choquenot

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Choquenot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Choquenot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Choquenot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Choquenot

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Choquenot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Choquenot. The network helps show where David Choquenot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Choquenot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Choquenot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Choquenot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Choquenot. David Choquenot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Stanley, Margaret C., et al.. (2016). Reducing Wildlife Damage with Cost-Effective Management Programmes. PLoS ONE. 11(1). e0146765–e0146765. 17 indexed citations

Cruz, Jennyffer, et al.. (2016). Decision Support Systems for Improving Invasive Rabbit Management in Australia. Proceedings - Vertebrate Pest Conference. 27. 1 indexed citations

Choquenot, David. (2014). ESTIMATING SUSTAINABLE HARVESTS FOR WILD PIG POPULATIONS IN AUSTRALIA'S RANGELANDS. 3.

Waipara, Nick, et al.. (2012). Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence: Feral pigs as vectors of soil‐borne pathogens. Austral Ecology. 38(5). 534–542. 19 indexed citations

Warburton, Bruce, Daniel M. Tompkins, David Choquenot, & P. E. Cowan. (2012). Minimising number killed in long-term vertebrate pest management programmes, and associated economic incentives. Animal Welfare. 21(S1). 141–149. 14 indexed citations

Wilson, Deborah J., et al.. (2006). An experimental study of the impacts of understorey forest vegetation and herbivory by red deer and rodents on seedling establishment and species composition in Waitutu Forest, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 30(2). 191–207. 29 indexed citations

Choquenot, David. (2006). Bioeconomic Modeling in Conservation Pest Management: Effect of Stoat Control on Extinction Risk of an Indigenous New Zealand Passerine, Mohua ochrocephala. Conservation Biology. 20(2). 480–489. 13 indexed citations

Choquenot, David & Bruce Warburton. (2006). Modelling the cost-effectiveness of wallaby control in New Zealand. Wildlife Research. 33(2). 77–83. 5 indexed citations

Parkes, John, Alan Robley, David M. Forsyth, & David Choquenot. (2006). Adaptive Management Experiments in Vertebrate Pest Control in New Zealand and Australia. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 34(1). 229–236. 47 indexed citations

10.

Choquenot, David, Simon Nicol, & John D. Koehn. (2004). Bioeconomic modelling in the development of invasive fish policy. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 38(3). 419–428. 10 indexed citations

11.

Choquenot, David, et al.. (2001). Colonisation of new areas by stoats: time to establishment and requirements for detection. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 25(1). 83–88. 15 indexed citations

12.

Choquenot, David & John Parkes. (2001). Setting thresholds for pest control: how does pest density affect resource viability?. Biological Conservation. 99(1). 29–46. 62 indexed citations

13.

Choquenot, David & Jim Hone. (2000). USING BIOECONOMIC MODELS TO MAXIMIZE BENEFITS FROM VERTEBRATE PEST CONTROL: LAMB PREDATION BY FERAL PIGS. Insecta mundi. 21(5). 492–9. 5 indexed citations

14.

Fleming, Peter J. S., David Choquenot, & R. Mason. (2000). Aerial baiting of feral pigs ( Sus scrofa ) for the control of exotic disease in the semi-arid rangelands of New South Wales. Wildlife Research. 27(5). 531–537. 36 indexed citations

15.

Choquenot, David & Wendy A. Ruscoe. (1999). Assessing the effect of poisoning programs on the density of non-target fauna: Design and interpretation. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 23(2). 139–147. 9 indexed citations

16.

Choquenot, David. (1998). Testing the relative influence of instrinsic and extrinsic variation in food availability on feral pig populations in Australia's rangelands. Journal of Animal Ecology. 67(6). 887–907. 59 indexed citations

17.

Choquenot, David. (1995). Assessing visibility bias associated with helicopter counts of feral pigs in Australia's semi-arid rangelands. Wildlife Research. 22(5). 569–577. 26 indexed citations

18.

Choquenot, David. (1994). The dynamics of feral pig populations in the semi-arid rangelands of Eastern Australia. The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney). 10 indexed citations

19.

Freeland, W. J. & David Choquenot. (1990). Determinants of Herbivore Carrying Capacity: Plants, Nutrients, and Equus Asinus in Northern Australia. Ecology. 71(2). 589–597. 67 indexed citations

20.

Webb, Grahame J. W., David Choquenot, & Peter Whitehead. (1986). Nests, eggs, and embryonic development of Carettochelys insculpta (Chelonia: Carettochelidae) from Northern Australia. Journal of Zoology. 1(3). 521–550. 77 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact