K. Chandrashekar

1.8k total citations
38 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

K. Chandrashekar is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, K. Chandrashekar has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Plant Science, 23 papers in Molecular Biology and 22 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in K. Chandrashekar's work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (17 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (16 papers) and Plant Virus Research Studies (9 papers). K. Chandrashekar is often cited by papers focused on Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (17 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (16 papers) and Plant Virus Research Studies (9 papers). K. Chandrashekar collaborates with scholars based in India, Nepal and South Korea. K. Chandrashekar's co-authors include Pradhyumna Kumar Singh, Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, Rakesh Tuli, Praveen C. Verma, Nidhi Thakur, Prabodh Kumar Trivedi, Ashutosh Pandey, Prashant Misra, Om P. Sidhu and J. Francis Borgio and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

In The Last Decade

K. Chandrashekar

37 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

K. Chandrashekar

BIOTE

IMMUN

Frédérique Hilliou France

Changxiang Zhu China

Leonardo Lima Pepino Macedo Brazil

Srinivasa Rao Uppalapati United States

Mercedes Díaz‐Mendoza Spain

Zhilong Bao China

Jiahe Wu China

Yasuhiro Ishiga Japan

Ruirui Zhao China

Siwei Zhang China

Frédérique Hilliou France

K. Chandrashekar

960 ×1.3

541 ×0.8

491 ×0.9

57 ×1.1

BIOTE

87 ×2.0

IMMUN

Citations per year, relative to K. Chandrashekar K. Chandrashekar (= 1×) peers Frédérique Hilliou

Countries citing papers authored by K. Chandrashekar

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Chandrashekar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Chandrashekar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Chandrashekar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Chandrashekar

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Chandrashekar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Chandrashekar. The network helps show where K. Chandrashekar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Chandrashekar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Chandrashekar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Chandrashekar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. Chandrashekar. K. Chandrashekar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Shashank, P. R., et al.. (2018). Genetic homogeneity in South American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta: a new invasive pest to oriental region. 3 Biotech. 8(8). 350–350. 17 indexed citations

Shashank, P. R., et al.. (2016). Report of invasive tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) from northern India. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 86(12). 16 indexed citations

Chandrashekar, K., et al.. (2015). Population dynamics of thrips species infecting vegetable crops in Maharashtra. Indian journal of plant protection. 43(3). 370–374. 1 indexed citations

Upadhyay, Santosh Kumar, Shailesh Sharma, Harpal Singh, et al.. (2015). Whitefly Genome Expression Reveals Host-Symbiont Interaction in Amino Acid Biosynthesis. PLoS ONE. 10(5). e0126751–e0126751. 24 indexed citations

Chandrashekar, K., et al.. (2014). Occasional occurrence of Gynaikothrips uzeli Zimmerman on tomato.. Current biotica. 8(1). 86–88.

Thakur, Nidhi, Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, Praveen C. Verma, et al.. (2014). Enhanced Whitefly Resistance in Transgenic Tobacco Plants Expressing Double Stranded RNA of v-ATPase A Gene. PLoS ONE. 9(3). e87235–e87235. 132 indexed citations

Dixit, Sameer, Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, Harpal Singh, et al.. (2013). Enhanced Methanol Production in Plants Provides Broad Spectrum Insect Resistance. PLoS ONE. 8(11). e79664–e79664. 39 indexed citations

Upadhyay, Santosh Kumar, Sameer Dixit, Shailesh Sharma, et al.. (2013). siRNA Machinery in Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci). PLoS ONE. 8(12). e83692–e83692. 36 indexed citations

Pandey, Ashutosh, Prashant Misra, K. Chandrashekar, & Prabodh Kumar Trivedi. (2012). Development of AtMYB12-expressing transgenic tobacco callus culture for production of rutin with biopesticidal potential. Plant Cell Reports. 31(10). 1867–1876. 63 indexed citations

10.

Upadhyay, Santosh Kumar, K. Chandrashekar, Nidhi Thakur, et al.. (2011). RNA interference for the control of whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci) by oral route. Journal of Biosciences. 36(1). 153–161. 189 indexed citations

11.

Upadhyay, Santosh Kumar, Sharad Saurabh, Rahul Singh, et al.. (2011). Purification and Characterization of a Lectin with High Hemagglutination Property Isolated from Allium altaicum. The Protein Journal. 30(6). 374–383. 6 indexed citations

12.

Misra, Prashant, Ashutosh Pandey, Manish Tiwari, et al.. (2010). Modulation of Transcriptome and Metabolome of Tobacco by Arabidopsis Transcription Factor, AtMYB12, Leads to Insect Resistance. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 152(4). 2258–2268. 207 indexed citations

13.

Upadhyay, Santosh Kumar, Manisha Mishra, Harpal Singh, et al.. (2010). Interaction of Allium sativum leaf agglutinin with midgut brush border membrane vesicles proteins and its stability in Helicoverpa armigera. PROTEOMICS. 10(24). 4431–4440. 16 indexed citations

14.

Upadhyay, Santosh Kumar, Sharad Saurabh, Preeti Rai, et al.. (2010). SUMO fusion facilitates expression and purification of garlic leaf lectin but modifies some of its properties. Journal of Biotechnology. 146(1-2). 1–8. 21 indexed citations

15.

Chandrashekar, K., et al.. (2007). Synergistic action of neem and karanj to aphids and mites. Journal of Entomological Research. 31(2). 121–124. 8 indexed citations

16.

Chandrashekar, K., et al.. (2006). Efficacy of karanjin and different extracts of Pongamia pinnata against selected insect pests.. Journal of Entomological Research. 30(2). 103–108. 16 indexed citations

17.

Kalita, Jugal, et al.. (2006). Computational modelling and simulation of the immune system. International Journal of Bioinformatics Research and Applications. 2(1). 63–63. 15 indexed citations

18.

Chandrashekar, K., Archana Kumari, Vinay Kalia, & G. T. Gujar. (2005). Baseline susceptibility of the American bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) to Bacillus thuringiensis Berl. var. kurstaki and its endotoxins in India.. Current Science. 88(1). 167–175. 12 indexed citations

19.

Chandrashekar, K. & N. Srinivasa. (2003). Residual toxicity of selected pesticides to two spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) infesting french bean. Journal of Entomological Research. 27(3). 197–205. 1 indexed citations

20.

Kumari, Archana, et al.. (2000). Spatial and temporal variation in susceptibility of the American bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) to Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki in India.. Current Science. 78(8). 995–1001. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact