Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with humanized anti–interleukin‐6 receptor antibody: A multicenter, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial
This map shows the geographic impact of Junichi Azuma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Junichi Azuma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Junichi Azuma more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Junichi Azuma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Junichi Azuma. The network helps show where Junichi Azuma may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Junichi Azuma
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Junichi Azuma.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Junichi Azuma based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Junichi Azuma. Junichi Azuma is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Tanaka, Fumio, et al.. (1997). Characterization of β-(1→4)-D-galactan. 84(84). 37–38.2 indexed citations
11.
Azuma, Junichi, et al.. (1991). Distribution of Esterified Phenolic Acids in Cell Walls of Immature Bamboo. Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University). 63. 272–282.2 indexed citations
12.
Azuma, Junichi, et al.. (1990). Induction of Callus from Mistletoe and Interaction with its Host Cells. Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University). 62(62). 261–269.6 indexed citations
Azuma, Junichi, T. Katayama, & Tetsuo Koshijima. (1986). Microwave Irradiation of Lignocellulosic Materials : VIII. Microwave Irradiation of the Neutral Fraction (C-I-M) of Pine Bjorkman LCC. 72. 1–11.5 indexed citations
15.
Azuma, Junichi, et al.. (1985). Microwave Irradiation of Lignocellulosic Materials : IV. Enhancement of Enzymatic Susceptibility of Microwave-irradiated Softwoods. 71(4). 13–24.14 indexed citations
16.
Azuma, Junichi, et al.. (1985). Effects of Microwave Irradiation on Enzymatic Susceptibility of Crystalline Cellulose : Microwave Irradiation of Lignocellulosic Materials (V).. Journal of Fermentation Technology. 63(6). 529–536.5 indexed citations
17.
Azuma, Junichi & Tetsuo Koshijima. (1984). Enzymatic Saccharification of Woody Plants : II. Synergistic Effects on Enzymatic Saccharification. 70. 17–24.2 indexed citations
18.
Azuma, Junichi, Fumio Tanaka, & Tetsuo Koshijima. (1984). Enhancement of enzymatic susceptibility of lignocellulosic wastes by microwave irradiation. Journal of Fermentation Technology. 62(4). 377–384.93 indexed citations
19.
Azuma, Junichi, et al.. (1982). Studies on Digestive System of Termites : I. Digestion of Carbohydrates by Termite Coptotermes formosanus SHIRAKI. 68. 47–57.7 indexed citations
20.
Morita, Yoshiharu, et al.. (1977). 99) Electrocardiographic Observation on the Occurrence of Ventricular Fibrillation in Experimental Coronary Occlusion and Reperfusion. Japanese Circulation Journal-english Edition. 41(4). 464–465.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.