This map shows the geographic impact of Jun Young Bae's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jun Young Bae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jun Young Bae more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jun Young Bae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jun Young Bae. The network helps show where Jun Young Bae may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jun Young Bae
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jun Young Bae.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jun Young Bae based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jun Young Bae. Jun Young Bae is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bae, Jun Young, et al.. (2007). THE ABYSM OF A HILBERT ALGEBRA. Scientiae mathematicae Japonicae. 65(1). 135–140.3 indexed citations
4.
Bae, Jun Young, et al.. (2005). IDEAL THEORY OF SUBTRACTION ALGEBRAS. Scientiae mathematicae Japonicae. 61(3). 459–464.19 indexed citations
5.
Bae, Jun Young, et al.. (2004). ON IMPLICATIVE HYPER K-IDEALS OF HYPER K-ALGEBRAS. Scientiae mathematicae Japonicae. 59(3). 443–450.4 indexed citations
6.
Bae, Jun Young. (2004). ON (α, β)-FUZZY IDEALS OF BCK/BCI-ALGEBRAS. Scientiae mathematicae Japonicae. 60(3). 613–617.20 indexed citations
7.
Bae, Jun Young. (2004). SATISFACTORY FILTERS OF BCK-ALGEBRAS. Scientiae mathematicae Japonicae. 59(1). 113–119.
8.
Bae, Jun Young, et al.. (2004). FOLDING THEORY APPLIED TO SOME TYPES OF POSITIVE IMPLICATIVE HYPER BCK-IDEALS IN HYPER BCK-ALGEBRAS. Scientiae mathematicae Japonicae. 59(3). 517–523.
9.
Bae, Jun Young & Michiro Kondo. (2004). ON TRANSFER PRINCIPLE OF FUZZY BCK/BCI-ALGEBRAS. Scientiae mathematicae Japonicae. 59(1). 35–40.10 indexed citations
10.
Kondo, Michiro & Jun Young Bae. (2003). THE CLASS OF B-ALGEBRAS COINCIDES WITH THE CLASS OF GROUPS. Scientiae mathematicae Japonicae. 57(1). 197–199.8 indexed citations
11.
Bae, Jun Young, et al.. (2003). GENERALIZATIONS OF BCK-ALGEBRAS. Scientiae mathematicae Japonicae. 58(3). 603–611.2 indexed citations
12.
Zhang, Qun, et al.. (2002). SOME RESULTS IN HYPER BCK-ALGEBRAS. Scientiae mathematicae Japonicae. 55(2). 297–304.6 indexed citations
13.
Zhang, Qun, et al.. (2001). ON THE BRANCH OF BH-ALGEBRAS. Scientiae mathematicae Japonicae. 54(2). 363–367.2 indexed citations
14.
Bae, Jun Young. (2001). Q-FUZZY SUBALGEBRAS OF BCK/BCI-ALGEBRAS. Scientiae mathematicae Japonicae. 53(2). 317–322.1 indexed citations
15.
Zahedi, M. M., et al.. (2000). ON HYPERK-ALGEBRAS. Mathematica japonica. 52(1). 113–121.18 indexed citations
16.
Bae, Jun Young, et al.. (2000). IMPLICATIVE HYPERBCK-IDEALS OF HYPERBCK-ALGEBRAS. Mathematica japonica. 52(3). 435–443.8 indexed citations
17.
Bae, Jun Young, et al.. (1996). IDEAL LATTICES OF BCI-ALGEBRAS. Mathematica japonica. 44(2). 303–305.6 indexed citations
18.
Meng, Jie & Jun Young Bae. (1996). ATOMATIC EXTENSIONS OF BCK-ALGEBRAS TO PROPER BCI-ALGEBRAS. Mathematica japonica. 44(2). 313–315.1 indexed citations
19.
Bae, Jun Young. (1995). A NOTE ON FUZZY IDEALS IN BCK-ALGEBRAS. Mathematica japonica. 42(2). 333–335.5 indexed citations
20.
Bae, Jun Young, et al.. (1995). NIL IDEALS IN BCI-ALGEBRAS. Mathematica japonica. 41(2). 297–302.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.