Julius Perel

1.1k citations
48 papers · 908 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Julius Perel

48 papers receiving 829 citations

Peers

Julius Perel
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Spectroscopy 429
  • Computational Mechanics 329
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 353
  • Analytical Chemistry 86
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 55
Replace R. Clampitt with:
R. Clampitt United Kingdom
J. Depauw France
G. D. Magnuson United States
Joan B. Pallix United States
J H Leck United Kingdom
N. R. Whetten United States
R. Solarz United States
A. Nourtier France
Glenn J. Bastiaans United States
M. V. V. S. Rao United States
Julius Perel relative to R. Clampitt United Kingdom R. Clampitt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
R. Clampitt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julius Perel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julius Perel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julius Perel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julius Perel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julius Perel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julius Perel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julius Perel. The network helps show where Julius Perel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julius Perel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julius Perel Line = papers co-authored together Julius Perel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991115
2 196985
3 199282
4 196572
5 196260
6 196948
7 197147
8 196835
9 197034
10 196933
11 196032
12 198126
13 199023
14 197020
15 197018
16 196615
17 197115
18 196514
19 198714
20 198312

About Julius Perel

Julius Perel is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Spectroscopy, Computational Mechanics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 48 papers that have together received 908 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (17 papers), Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (16 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (14 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (9 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (6 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (4 papers) and X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (429 citations), Computational Mechanics (329 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (353 citations), Analytical Chemistry (86 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (55 citations). Julius Perel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Howard L. Daley, John F. Mahoney, P. A. Martino, Benjamin B. Bederson, Terry D. Lee, Stephen A. Ruatta, James M. Peek, Thomas A. Green, Kelsey D. Cook and Peter Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Review of Scientific Instruments, AIAA Journal, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact