Julien Glicenstein
- Surgery
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Developmental Biology top 5%
- Dermatology top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Topics
- Congenital limb and hand anomalies (9 papers)Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (8 papers)History of Medical Practice (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Julien Glicenstein
48 papers receiving 332 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Surgery 198
- Rehabilitation 79
- Developmental Biology 70
- Dermatology 64
- Epidemiology 49
Countries citing papers authored by Julien Glicenstein
This map shows the geographic impact of Julien Glicenstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julien Glicenstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julien Glicenstein more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julien Glicenstein
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julien Glicenstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julien Glicenstein. The network helps show where Julien Glicenstein may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julien Glicenstein
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julien Glicenstein. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julien Glicenstein based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julien Glicenstein. Julien Glicenstein is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | L'hypoplasie congénitale du pouce: Étude clinique à propos de 20 patients | 5 |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | Fibrolipomes du nerf médian : revue de dix cas opérés avec un recul moyen de huit ans | 16 |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | Fentes médianes de la main: Classification et indications thérapeutiques à propos de 29 cas | 6 |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | [Surgical treatment of severe club foot: cutaneous plasty (author's transl)]. | 1 |
| 20 | [Agenesis of the pectoralis major with brachysyndactyly (Poland's syndrome)]. | 3 |
About Julien Glicenstein
Julien Glicenstein is a scholar working on Anatomy, Developmental Biology and Dermatology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 370 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital limb and hand anomalies (9 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (8 papers) and History of Medical Practice (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (70 citations), Rehabilitation (79 citations) and Dermatology (64 citations). Julien Glicenstein has collaborated with scholars based in France and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include S. Guéro, Arielle Salon, Louis Dubertret, J Baruch, Bernard Coulomb, Eugene Bell, B Duhamel, P. Saffar, Caroline Leclercq and C. Vacher. Their work appears in journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Hand Clinics and Annales de Chirurgie Plastique Esthétique.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.