Julie Spicer
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Adriana GalvánB.J. CaseyMatthew C. DavidsonCatherine MonkFrances A. ChampagneSarah DurstonNim TottenhamJohn Fossella
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (9 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers)Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of NeuroscienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNeuroImage
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Julie Spicer
26 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.0k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 518
- Clinical Psychology 412
- Social Psychology 309
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 271
Countries citing papers authored by Julie Spicer
This map shows the geographic impact of Julie Spicer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie Spicer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie Spicer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julie Spicer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie Spicer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie Spicer. The network helps show where Julie Spicer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie Spicer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie Spicer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie Spicer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julie Spicer. Julie Spicer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 47 | |
| 10 | 213 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 297 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 139 | |
| 15 | 211 | |
| 16 | 71 | |
| 17 | 41 | |
| 18 | 491 | |
| 19 | 176 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Julie Spicer
Julie Spicer is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 28 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (9 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (518 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (120 citations). Julie Spicer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Adriana Galván, B.J. Casey, Matthew C. Davidson, Catherine Monk, Frances A. Champagne, Sarah Durston, Nim Tottenham, John Fossella, Gary H. Glover and Todd A. Hare. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.