Julie Everitt
About
In The Last Decade
Julie Everitt
4 papers receiving 483 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Psychiatry and Mental health 420
- Clinical Psychology 239
- Philosophy 234
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 124
- Social Psychology 75
Countries citing papers authored by Julie Everitt
This map shows the geographic impact of Julie Everitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie Everitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie Everitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julie Everitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie Everitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie Everitt. The network helps show where Julie Everitt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie Everitt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie Everitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie Everitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julie Everitt. Julie Everitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 186 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 277 | |
| 4 | 41 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.