Julie Bach

3.2k total citations · 2 hit papers
10 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Julie Bach is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Julie Bach has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 3 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Julie Bach's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (1 paper) and Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (1 paper). Julie Bach is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (1 paper) and Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (1 paper). Julie Bach collaborates with scholars based in United States and Denmark. Julie Bach's co-authors include Lisa L. Barnes, Laurel Beckett, Denis A. Evans, David A. Bennett, Robert S. Wilson, Julie A. Schneider, Neelum T. Aggarwal, J. H. Fox, Carlos F. Mendes de Leon and Steven E. Arnold and has published in prestigious journals such as Neurology, Psychology and Aging and Global Journal of Health Science.

In The Last Decade

Julie Bach

8 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

Natural history of mild cognitive impairment in older per... 2002 2026 2010 2018 2002 2002 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Julie Bach United States 5 1.3k 781 421 202 202 10 2.2k
David W. Gilley United States 34 1.6k 1.2× 694 0.9× 403 1.0× 147 0.7× 268 1.3× 57 2.8k
Asenath La Rue United States 30 1.5k 1.1× 1.2k 1.5× 588 1.4× 250 1.2× 315 1.6× 68 3.1k
David Ames Australia 26 1.6k 1.2× 1.0k 1.3× 549 1.3× 301 1.5× 287 1.4× 99 3.4k
Tiffany F. Hughes United States 25 1.2k 0.9× 563 0.7× 329 0.8× 201 1.0× 179 0.9× 48 2.2k
Miranda G. Dik Netherlands 24 922 0.7× 790 1.0× 217 0.5× 185 0.9× 381 1.9× 32 2.7k
Selam Negash United States 21 1.2k 0.9× 655 0.8× 717 1.7× 193 1.0× 261 1.3× 37 2.2k
Ming Tang United States 26 1.3k 1.0× 1.0k 1.3× 364 0.9× 102 0.5× 332 1.6× 58 3.4k
M Katz United States 14 1.0k 0.8× 422 0.5× 369 0.9× 146 0.7× 127 0.6× 21 1.8k
Steffen Wolfsgruber Germany 20 1.4k 1.1× 663 0.8× 644 1.5× 288 1.4× 303 1.5× 39 2.5k
Karra Harrington United States 27 1.1k 0.8× 934 1.2× 543 1.3× 216 1.1× 191 0.9× 72 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Julie Bach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julie Bach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie Bach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie Bach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julie Bach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie Bach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie Bach. The network helps show where Julie Bach may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie Bach

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie Bach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie Bach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julie Bach. Julie Bach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
2.
Mathai, Rose Ann, et al.. (2018). Examining Self-Efficacy and Self-Esteem in Healthcare Students Participating in an Interprofessional Critical Care Simulation. Global Journal of Health Science. 10(9). 81–81. 1 indexed citations
3.
Wilson, Robert S., Julie A. Schneider, Lisa L. Barnes, et al.. (2002). The Apolipoprotein E ϵ4 Allele and Decline in Different Cognitive Systems During a 6-Year Period. Archives of Neurology. 59(7). 1154–1154. 169 indexed citations
4.
Wilson, Robert S., Lisa L. Barnes, Carlos F. Mendes de Leon, et al.. (2002). Depressive symptoms, cognitive decline, and risk of AD in older persons. Neurology. 59(3). 364–370. 418 indexed citations
5.
Wilson, R. J., Laurel Beckett, Lisa L. Barnes, et al.. (2002). Individual differences in rates of change in cognitive abilities of older persons.. Psychology and Aging. 17(2). 179–193. 52 indexed citations
6.
Wilson, Robert S., Laurel Beckett, Lisa L. Barnes, et al.. (2002). Individual differences in rates of change in cognitive abilities of older persons.. Psychology and Aging. 17(2). 179–193. 705 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Bennett, David A., Robert S. Wilson, Julie A. Schneider, et al.. (2002). Natural history of mild cognitive impairment in older persons. Neurology. 59(2). 198–205. 822 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Bach, Julie, et al.. (1993). Hillary Rodham Clinton.
9.
Bach, Julie, et al.. (1988). An autopsy research program. American Journal of Alzheimer s Care and Related Disorders & Research. 3(2). 9–14. 1 indexed citations
10.
Bach, Julie, et al.. (1987). Biomedical ethics : opposing viewpoints. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026