Julianna Caon
About
In The Last Decade
Julianna Caon
8 papers receiving 91 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
- Cancer Research 52
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 36
- Neurology 33
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 22
- Surgery 18
Countries citing papers authored by Julianna Caon
This map shows the geographic impact of Julianna Caon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julianna Caon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julianna Caon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julianna Caon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julianna Caon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julianna Caon. The network helps show where Julianna Caon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julianna Caon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julianna Caon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julianna Caon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julianna Caon. Julianna Caon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.