Juliane Dannberg

1.2k total citations
32 papers, 700 citations indexed

About

Juliane Dannberg is a scholar working on Geophysics, Molecular Biology and Computational Mechanics. According to data from OpenAlex, Juliane Dannberg has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 700 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Geophysics, 4 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Computational Mechanics. Recurrent topics in Juliane Dannberg's work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (24 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (24 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (16 papers). Juliane Dannberg is often cited by papers focused on Geological and Geochemical Analysis (24 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (24 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (16 papers). Juliane Dannberg collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Juliane Dannberg's co-authors include René Gassmöller, Wolfgang Bangerth, S. V. Sobolev, Robert Myhill, Bernhard Steinberger, P. Moulik, U. Faul, Z. Eilon, Trond H. Torsvik and Anne Glerum and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Nature Geoscience.

In The Last Decade

Juliane Dannberg

28 papers receiving 682 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Juliane Dannberg United States 14 627 63 48 42 35 32 700
Siavash Ghelichkhan Australia 12 547 0.9× 100 1.6× 51 1.1× 42 1.0× 55 1.6× 23 637
D. S. Weeraratne United States 17 802 1.3× 50 0.8× 29 0.6× 35 0.8× 17 0.5× 36 887
Anne Glerum Germany 14 506 0.8× 60 1.0× 78 1.6× 15 0.4× 98 2.8× 32 588
Lorenzo Colli Germany 12 566 0.9× 67 1.1× 73 1.5× 49 1.2× 54 1.5× 24 621
Daisuke Suetsugu Japan 23 1.2k 1.9× 37 0.6× 62 1.3× 51 1.2× 18 0.5× 86 1.3k
Jörg Hasenclever Germany 12 322 0.5× 55 0.9× 26 0.5× 10 0.2× 27 0.8× 26 411
T. V. Gerya Switzerland 14 1.2k 1.9× 52 0.8× 72 1.5× 14 0.3× 45 1.3× 26 1.3k
Weronika Gorczyk Australia 17 860 1.4× 41 0.7× 37 0.8× 13 0.3× 14 0.4× 26 957
Manuele Faccenda Italy 26 2.6k 4.1× 46 0.7× 84 1.8× 19 0.5× 28 0.8× 69 2.6k
Sami El Khrepy Egypt 22 882 1.4× 72 1.1× 98 2.0× 16 0.4× 21 0.6× 46 992

Countries citing papers authored by Juliane Dannberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Juliane Dannberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Juliane Dannberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Juliane Dannberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Juliane Dannberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Juliane Dannberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Juliane Dannberg. The network helps show where Juliane Dannberg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Juliane Dannberg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Juliane Dannberg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Juliane Dannberg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Juliane Dannberg. Juliane Dannberg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dannberg, Juliane, Z. Eilon, Joshua B. Russell, & René Gassmöller. (2025). Understanding Sub‐Lithospheric Small‐Scale Convection by Linking Models of Grain Size Evolution, Mantle Convection, and Seismic Tomography. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems. 26(9).
2.
Dannberg, Juliane, et al.. (2025). How Phase Transitions Impact Changes in Mantle Convection Style Throughout Earth's History: From Stalled Plumes to Surface Dynamics. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems. 26(2). 2 indexed citations
3.
Fraters, Menno, et al.. (2024). The Geodynamic World Builder: A planetary structurecreator for the geosciences. The Journal of Open Source Software. 9(101). 6671–6671. 1 indexed citations
4.
Gassmöller, René, Juliane Dannberg, Wolfgang Bangerth, Elbridge Gerry Puckett, & Cédric Thieulot. (2024). Benchmarking the accuracy of higher-order particle methods in geodynamic models of transient flow. Geoscientific model development. 17(10). 4115–4134.
5.
Heron, Philip J., Juliane Dannberg, René Gassmöller, et al.. (2024). The impact of Pangean subducted oceans on mantle dynamics: Passive piles and the positioning of deep mantle plumes. Gondwana Research. 138. 168–185.
6.
Heron, Philip J., Grace E. Shephard, Juliane Dannberg, et al.. (2023). The role of subduction in the formation of Pangaean oceanic large igneous provinces. Geological Society London Special Publications. 542(1). 105–128. 4 indexed citations
7.
Dannberg, Juliane, et al.. (2023). High‐Resolution Mantle Flow Models Reveal Importance of Plate Boundary Geometry and Slab Pull Forces on Generating Tectonic Plate Motions. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth. 128(8). 6 indexed citations
8.
Dannberg, Juliane, et al.. (2023). Linking Geodynamic Models of Basalt Segregation in Mantle Plumes to the X‐Discontinuity Observed Beneath Hotspots. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth. 128(6). 1 indexed citations
9.
Myhill, Robert, et al.. (2023). BurnMan – a Python toolkit for planetary geophysics,geochemistry and thermodynamics. The Journal of Open Source Software. 8(87). 5389–5389. 9 indexed citations
11.
Zelst, Iris van, Fabio Crameri, Adina E. Pusok, et al.. (2022). 101 geodynamic modelling: how to design, interpret, and communicate numerical studies of the solid Earth. Solid Earth. 13(3). 583–637. 19 indexed citations
12.
Zelst, Iris van, Fabio Crameri, Adina E. Pusok, et al.. (2021). 101 Geodynamic modelling: How to design, carry out, and interpretnumerical studies. 8 indexed citations
13.
Steinberger, Bernhard, et al.. (2021). Mantle convection and possible mantle plumes beneath Antarctica – insights from geodynamic models and implications for topography. Geological Society London Memoirs. 56(1). 253–266. 15 indexed citations
14.
Dannberg, Juliane & René Gassmöller. (2018). Chemical trends in ocean islands explained by plume–slab interaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115(17). 4351–4356. 37 indexed citations
15.
Dannberg, Juliane, Z. Eilon, U. Faul, et al.. (2017). The importance of grain size to mantle dynamics and seismological observations. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems. 18(8). 3034–3061. 71 indexed citations
16.
Bangerth, Wolfgang, et al.. (2017). ASPECT: Advanced Solver for Problems in Earth's ConvecTion, User Manual. Figshare. 7 indexed citations
17.
Dannberg, Juliane, et al.. (2017). High accuracy mantle convection simulation through modern numerical methods – II: realistic models and problems. Geophysical Journal International. 210(2). 833–851. 205 indexed citations
18.
Dannberg, Juliane, et al.. (2016). Compressible magma/mantle dynamics: 3-D, adaptive simulations in ASPECT. Geophysical Journal International. 207(3). 1343–1366. 40 indexed citations
19.
Dannberg, Juliane, et al.. (2015). Grain size evolution in the mantle and its effect on geodynamics, seismic velocities and attenuation. EGUGA. 10825. 1 indexed citations
20.
Dannberg, Juliane & S. V. Sobolev. (2015). Low-buoyancy thermochemical plumes resolve controversy of classical mantle plume concept. Nature Communications. 6(1). 6960–6960. 83 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026