Julia Schulte-Cloos

681 total citations
10 papers, 178 citations indexed

About

Julia Schulte-Cloos is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia Schulte-Cloos has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 178 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Julia Schulte-Cloos's work include Populism, Right-Wing Movements (7 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers) and Social Media and Politics (2 papers). Julia Schulte-Cloos is often cited by papers focused on Populism, Right-Wing Movements (7 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers) and Social Media and Politics (2 papers). Julia Schulte-Cloos collaborates with scholars based in Italy, Germany and Russia. Julia Schulte-Cloos's co-authors include Hanspeter Kriesi, Paul Cornelius Bauer, Arndt Leininger, Tobias Rüttenauer and Donato Di Carlo and has published in prestigious journals such as European Journal of Political Research, Journal of European Public Policy and Political Communication.

In The Last Decade

Julia Schulte-Cloos

10 papers receiving 171 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Julia Schulte-Cloos	142	76	39	12	11	10	178
Dániel Hegedüs	155 1.1×	89 1.2×	16 0.4×	16 1.3×	6 0.5×	5	206
Iván Llamazares	191 1.3×	81 1.1×	27 0.7×	13 1.1×	7 0.6×	38	224
Marie Demker	122 0.9×	82 1.1×	25 0.6×	7 0.6×	12 1.1×	24	167
Maria Oskarson	93 0.7×	50 0.7×	22 0.6×	8 0.7×	8 0.7×	17	125
Guillem Vidal	167 1.2×	52 0.7×	29 0.7×	14 1.2×	5 0.5×	8	195
José Javier Olivas Osuna	110 0.8×	56 0.7×	47 1.2×	5 0.4×	4 0.4×	26	153
Evelyn Bytzek	160 1.1×	63 0.8×	36 0.9×	29 2.4×	14 1.3×	26	197
Sean Ingham	135 1.0×	59 0.8×	48 1.2×	6 0.5×	8 0.7×	19	165
Arthur Borriello	117 0.8×	32 0.4×	20 0.5×	15 1.3×	7 0.6×	16	149
Dario Tuorto	148 1.0×	112 1.5×	39 1.0×	4 0.3×	12 1.1×	37	200

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Schulte-Cloos

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Schulte-Cloos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Schulte-Cloos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Schulte-Cloos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Schulte-Cloos

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Schulte-Cloos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Schulte-Cloos. The network helps show where Julia Schulte-Cloos may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Schulte-Cloos

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Schulte-Cloos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Schulte-Cloos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Schulte-Cloos. Julia Schulte-Cloos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Schulte-Cloos, Julia, et al.. (2023). Right-Wing Authoritarian Attitudes, Fast-Paced Decision-Making, and the Spread of Misinformation About COVID-19 Vaccines. Political Communication. 41(4). 608–626. 3 indexed citations

Schulte-Cloos, Julia, et al.. (2022). COVID‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy. European Journal of Political Research. 62(2). 660–673. 5 indexed citations

Schulte-Cloos, Julia. (2022). Political Potentials, Deep-Seated Nativism and the Success of the German AfD. Frontiers in Political Science. 3. 11 indexed citations

Schulte-Cloos, Julia & Arndt Leininger. (2021). Electoral participation, political disaffection, and the rise of the populist radical right. Party Politics. 28(3). 431–443. 31 indexed citations

Schulte-Cloos, Julia & Paul Cornelius Bauer. (2021). Local Candidates, Place-Based Identities, and Electoral Success. Political Behavior. 45(2). 679–698. 31 indexed citations

Kriesi, Hanspeter & Julia Schulte-Cloos. (2020). Support for radical parties in Western Europe: Structural conflicts and political dynamics. Electoral Studies. 65. 102138–102138. 48 indexed citations

Schulte-Cloos, Julia. (2019). The effect of European Parliament elections on political socialisation. Journal of European Public Policy. 26(7). 1094–1111. 9 indexed citations

Carlo, Donato Di, et al.. (2018). Has Immigration Really Led to an Increase in Crime in Italy?. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 1 indexed citations

Schulte-Cloos, Julia. (2018). Do European Parliament elections foster challenger parties' success on the national level?. European Union Politics. 19(3). 408–426. 37 indexed citations

10.

Schulte-Cloos, Julia & Tobias Rüttenauer. (2018). A Transformation From Within? Dynamics of Party Activists and the Rise of the German AfD. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact