Julia Regnery

859 citations
7 papers · 83 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

    • Cryospheric studies and observations 5
    • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics 5
    • Climate change and permafrost 4
    • Heavy metals in environment 1

Julia Regnery

7 papers receiving 82 citations

Peers

Julia Regnery
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Atmospheric Science 65
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 5
  • Geophysics 10
  • Analytical Chemistry 7
  • Environmental Chemistry 6
Replace R. F. Rodrigues with:
R. F. Rodrigues Brazil
Rollin D. Salisbury
Whitman Cross
Bradley Garczynski United States
Jonas Gliß Norway
Yonggang Yao China
D. Ponomarenko Italy
C. Curtil France
Takanori Kodama Japan
J. Steurer United States
Julia Regnery relative to R. F. Rodrigues Brazil R. F. Rodrigues's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16×
R. F. Rodrigues · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Regnery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Regnery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Regnery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Regnery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Regnery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Regnery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Regnery. The network helps show where Julia Regnery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Regnery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Regnery Line = papers co-authored together Julia Regnery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 202244
2 200916
3 202111
4 20245
5 20144
6 20212
7 20211

About Julia Regnery

Julia Regnery is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Pollution, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Geochemistry and Petrology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 83 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cryospheric studies and observations (5 papers), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (5 papers), Climate change and permafrost (4 papers), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (1 paper), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (1 paper), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (1 paper), Heavy metals in environment (1 paper) and Avian ecology and behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (65 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (5 citations), Geophysics (10 citations), Analytical Chemistry (7 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (6 citations). Julia Regnery has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Klaus Peter Jochum, Brigitte Stoll, Thomas Krumpen, Benjamin Rabe, Hangzhou Wang, Fanyi Zhang, Jari Haapala, Donald K. Perovich, Marcel Nicolaus and Jennifer Hutchings. Their work appears in journals such as Elementa Science of the Anthropocene, Antarctic Science, Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research and Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact